These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23213050)

  • 1. Examining the predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of decoding to forecast response to tier 2 intervention.
    Cho E; Compton DL; Fuchs D; Fuchs LS; Bouton B
    J Learn Disabil; 2014; 47(5):409-23. PubMed ID: 23213050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The construct and predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of young children learning to read: implications for RTI frameworks.
    Fuchs D; Compton DL; Fuchs LS; Bouton B; Caffrey E
    J Learn Disabil; 2011; 44(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 21685347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling the response of normally achieving and at-risk first grade children to word reading instruction.
    Compton DL
    Ann Dyslexia; 2000 Jan; 50(1):53-84. PubMed ID: 20563780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties.
    Denton CA; Fletcher JM; Anthony JL; Francis DJ
    J Learn Disabil; 2006; 39(5):447-66. PubMed ID: 17004676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Arabic word identification fluency to monitor first-grade reading progress.
    Abu-Hamour B
    Dyslexia; 2014 May; 20(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 24375873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining Predictive Validity of Oral Reading Fluency Slope in Upper Elementary Grades Using Quantile Regression.
    Cho E; Capin P; Roberts G; Vaughn S
    J Learn Disabil; 2018; 51(6):565-577. PubMed ID: 28758526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: failure to validate discrepancy method.
    Stage SA; Abbott RD; Jenkins JR; Berninger VW
    J Learn Disabil; 2003; 36(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 15490889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability.
    Saine NL; Lerkkanen MK; Ahonen T; Tolvanen A; Lyytinen H
    Child Dev; 2011; 82(3):1013-28. PubMed ID: 21418055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in Growth Reading Patterns for at-Risk Spanish-Monolingual Children as a Function of a Tier 2 Intervention.
    Crespo P; Jiménez JE; Rodríguez C; Baker D; Park Y
    Span J Psychol; 2018 Mar; 21():E4. PubMed ID: 29521612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a supplemental reading intervention for first-grade children.
    Case LP; Speece DL; Silverman R; Ritchey KD; Schatschneider C; Cooper DH; Montanaro E; Jacobs D
    J Learn Disabil; 2010; 43(5):402-17. PubMed ID: 20375291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting and Evaluating Treatment Response: Evidence Toward Protracted Response Patterns for Severely Impacted Students With Dyslexia.
    Middleton AE; Farris EA; Ring JJ; Odegard TN
    J Learn Disabil; 2022; 55(4):272-291. PubMed ID: 34612740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive Validity of Curriculum-Embedded Measures on Outcomes of Kindergarteners Identified as At Risk for Reading Difficulty.
    Oslund EL; Hagan-Burke S; Simmons DC; Clemens NH; Simmons LE; Taylor AB; Kwok OM; Coyne MD
    J Learn Disabil; 2017; 50(6):712-723. PubMed ID: 27553037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A test of the cerebellar hypothesis of dyslexia in adequate and inadequate responders to reading intervention.
    Barth AE; Denton CA; Stuebing KK; Fletcher JM; Cirino PT; Francis DJ; Vaughn S
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 May; 16(3):526-36. PubMed ID: 20298639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving early language and literacy skills: differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention.
    Bowyer-Crane C; Snowling MJ; Duff FJ; Fieldsend E; Carroll JM; Miles J; Götz K; Hulme C
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2008 Apr; 49(4):422-32. PubMed ID: 18081756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized trial of individual tutoring for elementary school children with reading and behavior difficulties.
    Strayhorn JM; Bickel DD
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Apr; 92(2):427-44. PubMed ID: 12785624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting Reading Problems 6 Years Into the Future: Dynamic Assessment Reduces Bias and Increases Classification Accuracy.
    Petersen DB; Gragg SL; Spencer TD
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2018 Oct; 49(4):875-888. PubMed ID: 30458547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Growth on sublexical fluency progress monitoring measures in early kindergarten and relations to word reading acquisition.
    Clemens NH; Lee K; Henri M; Simmons LE; Kwok OM; Al Otaiba S
    J Sch Psychol; 2020 Apr; 79():43-62. PubMed ID: 32389248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal outcomes of an individualized and intensive reading intervention for third grade students.
    Partanen M; Siegel LS; Giaschi DE
    Dyslexia; 2019 Aug; 25(3):227-245. PubMed ID: 31020760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. First-grade cognitive abilities as long-term predictors of reading comprehension and disability status.
    Fuchs D; Compton DL; Fuchs LS; Bryant VJ; Hamlett CL; Lambert W
    J Learn Disabil; 2012; 45(3):217-31. PubMed ID: 22539057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory processing in developmental dyslexia: an exploratory study of an auditory and visual matching training program with Swedish children with developmental dyslexia.
    Törmänen MR; Takala M
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Jun; 50(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 19302414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.