359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23215584)
1. An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: the strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation.
Saito T; Kuramae R; Wohlert J; Berglund LA; Isogai A
Biomacromolecules; 2013 Jan; 14(1):248-53. PubMed ID: 23215584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the Strength of Single Chitin Nanofibrils via Sonication-Induced Fragmentation.
Bamba Y; Ogawa Y; Saito T; Berglund LA; Isogai A
Biomacromolecules; 2017 Dec; 18(12):4405-4410. PubMed ID: 29135235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Humidity and multiscale structure govern mechanical properties and deformation modes in films of native cellulose nanofibrils.
BenÃtez AJ; Torres-Rendon J; Poutanen M; Walther A
Biomacromolecules; 2013 Dec; 14(12):4497-506. PubMed ID: 24245557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness.
Henriksson M; Berglund LA; Isaksson P; Lindström T; Nishino T
Biomacromolecules; 2008 Jun; 9(6):1579-85. PubMed ID: 18498189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between length and degree of polymerization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils.
Shinoda R; Saito T; Okita Y; Isogai A
Biomacromolecules; 2012 Mar; 13(3):842-9. PubMed ID: 22276990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structure and mechanical properties of wet-spun fibers made from natural cellulose nanofibers.
Iwamoto S; Isogai A; Iwata T
Biomacromolecules; 2011 Mar; 12(3):831-6. PubMed ID: 21302950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative characterization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril films prepared from non-wood resources.
Puangsin B; Yang Q; Saito T; Isogai A
Int J Biol Macromol; 2013 Aug; 59():208-13. PubMed ID: 23603078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril length on film properties.
Fukuzumi H; Saito T; Isogai A
Carbohydr Polym; 2013 Mar; 93(1):172-7. PubMed ID: 23465916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface engineering of ultrafine cellulose nanofibrils toward polymer nanocomposite materials.
Fujisawa S; Saito T; Kimura S; Iwata T; Isogai A
Biomacromolecules; 2013 May; 14(5):1541-6. PubMed ID: 23540813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers.
Isogai A; Saito T; Fukuzumi H
Nanoscale; 2011 Jan; 3(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 20957280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical performance of macrofibers of cellulose and chitin nanofibrils aligned by wet-stretching: a critical comparison.
Torres-Rendon JG; Schacher FH; Ifuku S; Walther A
Biomacromolecules; 2014 Jul; 15(7):2709-17. PubMed ID: 24947934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Highly Transparent and Toughened Poly(methyl methacrylate) Nanocomposite Films Containing Networks of Cellulose Nanofibrils.
Dong H; Sliozberg YR; Snyder JF; Steele J; Chantawansri TL; Orlicki JA; Walck SD; Reiner RS; Rudie AW
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Nov; 7(45):25464-72. PubMed ID: 26513136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cation-induced hydrogels of cellulose nanofibrils with tunable moduli.
Dong H; Snyder JF; Williams KS; Andzelm JW
Biomacromolecules; 2013 Sep; 14(9):3338-45. PubMed ID: 23919541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colloidal ionic assembly between anionic native cellulose nanofibrils and cationic block copolymer micelles into biomimetic nanocomposites.
Wang M; Olszewska A; Walther A; Malho JM; Schacher FH; Ruokolainen J; Ankerfors M; Laine J; Berglund LA; Osterberg M; Ikkala O
Biomacromolecules; 2011 Jun; 12(6):2074-81. PubMed ID: 21517114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the properties of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils isolated from bacteria, tunicate, and wood processed using acid, enzymatic, mechanical, and oxidative methods.
Sacui IA; Nieuwendaal RC; Burnett DJ; Stranick SJ; Jorfi M; Weder C; Foster EJ; Olsson RT; Gilman JW
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2014 May; 6(9):6127-38. PubMed ID: 24746103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrastrong and flame-retardant microfibers via microfluidic wet spinning of phosphorylated cellulose nanofibrils.
Ren N; Chen S; Cui M; Huang R; Qi W; He Z; Su R
Carbohydr Polym; 2022 Nov; 296():119945. PubMed ID: 36087993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Superior reinforcement effect of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils in polystyrene matrix: optical, thermal, and mechanical studies.
Fujisawa S; Ikeuchi T; Takeuchi M; Saito T; Isogai A
Biomacromolecules; 2012 Jul; 13(7):2188-94. PubMed ID: 22642863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A transparent, hazy, and strong macroscopic ribbon of oriented cellulose nanofibrils bearing poly(ethylene glycol).
Tang H; Butchosa N; Zhou Q
Adv Mater; 2015 Mar; 27(12):2070-6. PubMed ID: 25665182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High mechanical strength gelatin composite hydrogels reinforced by cellulose nanofibrils with unique beads-on-a-string morphology.
Liu Q; Liu J; Qin S; Pei Y; Zheng X; Tang K
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Dec; 164():1776-1784. PubMed ID: 32791281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrastrong and high gas-barrier nanocellulose/clay-layered composites.
Wu CN; Saito T; Fujisawa S; Fukuzumi H; Isogai A
Biomacromolecules; 2012 Jun; 13(6):1927-32. PubMed ID: 22568705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
