These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2321597)

  • 21. Orthodontic treatment of openbite and deepbite high-angle malocclusions.
    Hering K; Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 10515146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion.
    Mouakeh M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):640-9. PubMed ID: 11395709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Changes in bite force and dentoskeletal morphology in prognathic patients after orthognathic surgery.
    Harada K; Kikuchi T; Morishima S; Sato M; Ohkura K; Omura K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 12789142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting the sagittal skeletal pattern using dental cast and facial profile photographs in children aged 9 to 14 years.
    Sukhia RH; Nuruddin R; Azam SI; Fida M
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2022 Nov; 72(11):2198-2203. PubMed ID: 37013286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Skeletal and dental contributions to posterior crossbites.
    Allen D; Rebellato J; Sheats R; Ceron AM
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Oct; 73(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 14580018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic value of profile photography in identifying departures from the norm of growth pattern and horizontal jaw relationship.
    Sajjadi SH; Elmi B; Hajizade N; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):322-331. PubMed ID: 28778724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue cephalometric measurements of Malay transfusion-dependent thalassaemia patients.
    Toman HA; Nasir A; Hassan R; Hassan R
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):700-4. PubMed ID: 21282284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Profile types in relation to facial angle in different skeletal jaw relationships].
    Blazeyĭ Z; Tanic T; Radojicic J
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2009; 88(6):66-72. PubMed ID: 20081785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A nonradiographic approach to detect Class III skeletal discrepancies.
    Staudt CB; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19577148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Facial changes in children treated with the Activator appliance: a lateral cephalometric study.
    Mamandras AH; D'Aloisio DR; Lenizky RJ
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1989 Sep; 55(9):727-30. PubMed ID: 2676117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relationship between dental crowding, skeletal base lengths, and dentofacial measurements.
    Montasser MA; Taha M
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Nov; 13(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 23260539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
    Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bimaxillary surgery in Class III malocclusion: soft and hard tissue changes.
    Aydil B; Özer N; Marşan G
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 23182267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Realities of craniofacial growth modification.
    Kluemper GT; Spalding PM
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):23-51. PubMed ID: 11905336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Growth patterns in subjects with long and short faces.
    Nanda SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Sep; 98(3):247-58. PubMed ID: 2403077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.