These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23216664)
1. Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models. Karoui S; Carabaño MJ; Díaz C; Legarra A Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Dec; 44(1):39. PubMed ID: 23216664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population. Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds. Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of meta-analyses and joint analyses to select variants in whole genome sequences for genomic evaluation: An application in milk production of French dairy cattle breeds. Teissier M; Sanchez MP; Boussaha M; Barbat A; Hoze C; Robert-Granie C; Croiseau P J Dairy Sci; 2018 Apr; 101(4):3126-3139. PubMed ID: 29428760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle. Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of joint versus purebred genomic evaluation in the French multi-breed dairy goat population. Carillier C; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):67. PubMed ID: 25927866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of genomic selection on genetic diversity and genetic gain in three French dairy cattle breeds. Doublet AC; Croiseau P; Fritz S; Michenet A; Hozé C; Danchin-Burge C; Laloë D; Restoux G Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):52. PubMed ID: 31547802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle. Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle. Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):625-34. PubMed ID: 23102955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits. Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing genomic prediction for Australian Red dairy cattle. van den Berg I; MacLeod IM; Reich CM; Breen EJ; Pryce JE J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6276-6298. PubMed ID: 32331891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AC; Verbyla K; Goddard ME Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Nov; 41(1):51. PubMed ID: 19930712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multibreed genomic evaluations using purebred Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. Olson KM; VanRaden PM; Tooker ME J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5378-5383. PubMed ID: 22916944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle. Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of single-trait to multi-trait national evaluations for yield, health, and fertility. VanRaden PM; Tooker ME; Wright JR; Sun C; Hutchison JL J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7952-62. PubMed ID: 25282421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits. Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic and single-step evaluations of carcass traits of young bulls in dual-purpose cattle. Croué I; Ducrocq V J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Aug; 134(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 28266083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows. Ding X; Zhang Z; Li X; Wang S; Wu X; Sun D; Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Q J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5315-23. PubMed ID: 23746588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population. Dehnavi E; Mahyari SA; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5166-5176. PubMed ID: 29605309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]