143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23216859)
1. Establishing local priorities for a health research agenda.
Whear R; Thompson-Coon J; Boddy K; Papworth H; Frier J; Stein K
Health Expect; 2015 Feb; 18(1):8-21. PubMed ID: 23216859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method.
Rafie CL; Zimmerman EB; Moser DE; Cook S; Zarghami F
Res Involv Engagem; 2019; 5():3. PubMed ID: 30656063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.
Hansford L; Wyatt K; Creanor S; McCready S; Harding R;
Public Health Res (Southampt); 2024 Feb; ():1-40. PubMed ID: 38421270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overview of a multi-stakeholder dialogue around Shared Services for Health: the Digital Health Opportunity in Bangladesh.
Ashraf S; Moore C; Gupta V; Chowdhury A; Azad AK; Singh N; Hagan D; Labrique AB
Health Res Policy Syst; 2015 Dec; 13():74. PubMed ID: 26646372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The development of a national nutrition and mental health research agenda with comparison of priorities among diverse stakeholders.
Davison KM; D'Andreamatteo C; Mitchell S; Vanderkooy P
Public Health Nutr; 2017 Mar; 20(4):712-725. PubMed ID: 28091353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Developing population health research priorities in Asian city state: Results from a multi-step participatory community engagement.
Thumboo J; Yoon S; Wee S; Yeam CT; Low ECT; Lee CE
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216303. PubMed ID: 31042782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
Carter YH; Shaw S; Macfarlane F
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 2002 Feb; (81):iii-vi, 1-72. PubMed ID: 12049028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stakeholder identified research priorities for early intervention in psychosis.
Renwick L; McWilliams C; Schaff O; Russell L; Ramsdale S; Morris RL
Health Expect; 2022 Dec; 25(6):2960-2970. PubMed ID: 36129063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effective stakeholder participation in setting research priorities using a Global Evidence Mapping approach.
Clavisi O; Bragge P; Tavender E; Turner T; Gruen RL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):496-502.e2. PubMed ID: 22819249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Setting the global research agenda for community-based HIV service delivery through the faith sector.
Ndlovu-Teijema MT; Kok MO; van Elsland SL; Smeets H; Barstow D; van Rooyen L; van Furth AM
Health Res Policy Syst; 2021 May; 19(1):81. PubMed ID: 34001142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.
Hijjeh M; Al Shaikh L; Alinier G; Selwood D; Malmstrom F; Hassan IF
Qatar Med J; 2019; 2019(2):2. PubMed ID: 31763205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Setting research priorities to improve the health of children and young people with neurodisability: a British Academy of Childhood Disability-James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership.
Morris C; Simkiss D; Busk M; Morris M; Allard A; Denness J; Janssens A; Stimson A; Coghill J; Robinson K; Fenton M; Cowan K
BMJ Open; 2015 Jan; 5(1):e006233. PubMed ID: 25631309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Establishing research priorities relating to the long-term impact of TIA and minor stroke through stakeholder-centred consensus.
Turner GM; Backman R; McMullan C; Mathers J; Marshall T; Calvert M
Res Involv Engagem; 2018; 4():2. PubMed ID: 29416879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research priorities for young people with cancer: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.
Aldiss S; Fern LA; Phillips RS; Callaghan A; Dyker K; Gravestock H; Groszmann M; Hamrang L; Hough R; McGeachy D; Morgan S; Smith S; Upadhyaya S; Veitch H; Veitch L; Williamson M; Whelan JS; Gibson F
BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e028119. PubMed ID: 31383701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Needs-led research: a way of employing user involvement when devising research questions on the trust model in community home-based health care services in Norway.
Slåtsveen RE; Wibe T; Halvorsrud L; Lund A
Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Jun; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 34158122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Research priorities and identification of a health-service delivery model for psoriasis from the UK Psoriasis Priority Setting Partnership.
Ismail D; McAteer H; Majeed-Ariss R; McPhee M; Griffiths CEM; Young HS
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2021 Mar; 46(2):276-285. PubMed ID: 32748405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using research priority-setting to guide bridging the implementation gap in countries - a case study of the Uganda newborn research priorities in the SDG era.
Waiswa P; Okuga M; Kabwijamu L; Akuze J; Sengendo H; Aliganyira P; Pirio P; Hanson C; Kaharuza F
Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 May; 17(1):54. PubMed ID: 31151401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementing health research through academic and clinical partnerships: a realistic evaluation of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC).
Rycroft-Malone J; Wilkinson JE; Burton CR; Andrews G; Ariss S; Baker R; Dopson S; Graham I; Harvey G; Martin G; McCormack BG; Staniszewska S; Thompson C
Implement Sci; 2011 Jul; 6():74. PubMed ID: 21771329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
