These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23217013)

  • 21. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths.
    Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative 3D finite element stress analysis of straight and angled wedge-shaped implant designs.
    Las Casas EB; Ferreira PC; Cimini CA; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Cruz M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 18548917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
    Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Cinar D; Imirzalioglu P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27004295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Finite Element Stress Analysis of Applied Forces to Implants and Supporting Tissues Using the "All-on-Four" Concept with Different Occlusal Schemes.
    Türker N; Büyükkaplan US; Sadowsky SJ; Özarslan MM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 30515911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing the influence of crestal cortical bone and sinus floor cortical bone in posterior maxilla bi-cortical dental implantation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yan X; Zhang X; Chi W; Ai H; Wu L
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 25330164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The extremely resorbed mandible, 10-year results of a randomized controlled trial on 3 treatment strategies.
    Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Visser A; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):926-32. PubMed ID: 23638947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical factors associated with mandibular cantilevers: analysis with three-dimensional finite element models.
    Gonda T; Yasuda D; Ikebe K; Maeda Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):e275-82. PubMed ID: 25397809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
    Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of fixed complete-arch prostheses supported by 4 immediate-loaded implants in the completely edentulous maxilla using clinical computerized tomography data.
    Kimura K; Fukase Y; Makino M; Masaki C; Nakamoto T; Hosokawa R
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():96-105. PubMed ID: 21495797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs.
    Shunmugasamy VC; Gupta N; Pessoa RS; Janal MN; Coelho PG
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031005. PubMed ID: 21303181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures.
    de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Freitas MM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1108-14. PubMed ID: 21197486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.