103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23217225)
1. Economic values under inappropriate normal distribution assumptions.
Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi A; Nejati-Javaremi A; Moradi-Shahrbabak M; Miraei-Ashtiani SR; Amer PR
Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1225-30. PubMed ID: 23217225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategies for defining traits when calculating economic values for livestock breeding: a review.
Wolfová M; Wolf J
Animal; 2013 Sep; 7(9):1401-13. PubMed ID: 23773679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of carcass price fluctuations on genetic and economic evaluation of carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle.
Ibi T; Kahi AK; Hirooka H
J Anim Sci; 2006 Dec; 84(12):3204-11. PubMed ID: 17093212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Problematic standard errors and confidence intervals for skewness and kurtosis.
Wright DB; Herrington JA
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 21298573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic values for production and functional traits and assessment of their influence on genetic improvement in the Boran cattle in Kenya.
Rewe TO; Indetie D; Ojango JM; Kahi AK
J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Feb; 123(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 16420262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A preference-based approach to deriving breeding objectives: applied to sheep breeding.
Byrne TJ; Amer PR; Fennessy PF; Hansen P; Wickham BW
Animal; 2012 May; 6(5):778-88. PubMed ID: 22558925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gametic gene flow method accounts for genomic imprinting.
Börner V; Reinsch N
J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Jun; 127(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 20536639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Data transformation and normalization].
Nishida T
Rinsho Byori; 2010 Oct; 58(10):990-7. PubMed ID: 21077289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consequences of selection for yield traits on calving ease performance.
López de Maturana E; Ugarte E; Komen J; van Arendonk JA
J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2497-505. PubMed ID: 17430954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing experimental data for univariate normality.
Henderson AR
Clin Chim Acta; 2006 Apr; 366(1-2):112-29. PubMed ID: 16388793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
König S; Swalve HH
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of genome-wide evaluation for disease resistance in aquaculture breeding programs.
Villanueva B; Fernández J; García-Cortés LA; Varona L; Daetwyler HD; Toro MA
J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3433-42. PubMed ID: 21742941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian prediction of breeding values for multivariate binary and continuous traits in simulated horse populations using threshold-linear models with Gibbs sampling.
Stock KF; Distl O; Hoeschele I
Animal; 2008 Jan; 2(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 22444958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of using DNA markers for beef bull selection in the seedstock sector.
Van Eenennaam AL; van der Werf JH; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):307-20. PubMed ID: 21262975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Skew-normal Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects models with application to AIDS studies.
Huang Y; Dagne G
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(23):2384-98. PubMed ID: 20603815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic change results from selection on an economic breeding objective in beef cattle.
Enns RM; Nicoll GB
J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3348-57. PubMed ID: 18469047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A method to define breeding goals for sustainable dairy cattle production.
Nielsen HM; Christensen LG; Odegård J
J Dairy Sci; 2006 Sep; 89(9):3615-25. PubMed ID: 16899697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
