BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23217543)

  • 1. Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence with the use of two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a cone-beam computed tomography device.
    de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Vasconcelos Kde F; Neves FS; Melo SL; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jan; 115(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 23217543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancement cone beam computed tomography filters improve in vitro periimplant dehiscence detection.
    de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Alencar PN; Rovaris K; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Nov; 116(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 24018127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of a cone beam computed tomography metal artifact reduction algorithm for the detection of peri-implant fenestrations and dehiscences.
    de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Peyneau PD; Ramirez-Sotelo LR; Vasconcelos Kde F; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 May; 121(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 27068312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The efficacy of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in cone-beam computed tomography on the diagnostic accuracy of fenestration and dehiscence around dental implants.
    Sheikhi M; Behfarnia P; Mostajabi M; Nasri N
    J Periodontol; 2020 Feb; 91(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 31364765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of alveolar bone defects with three different voxel sizes of cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Dong T; Yuan L; Liu L; Qian Y; Xia L; Ye N; Fang B
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):8146. PubMed ID: 31148581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Detection of Fenestration and Dehiscence around Dental Implants.
    Salemi F; Jamalpour MR; Eskandarloo A; Tapak L; Rahimi N
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2021 Jun; 11(3):305-314. PubMed ID: 34189119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
    Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of field of view in the detection of chemically created peri-implant bone defects in bovine ribs using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Pinheiro LR; Gaia BF; Oliveira de Sales MA; Umetsubo OS; Santos Junior O; Cavalcanti MG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Jul; 120(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 26093682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Field of View and Acquisition Frame on the Detection of Chemically Simulated Peri-Implant Bone Loss In Vitro.
    Pinheiro LR; Scarfe WC; Augusto de Oliveira Sales M; Gaia BF; Cortes AR; Cavalcanti MG
    J Periodontol; 2015 Oct; 86(10):1159-65. PubMed ID: 26156676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is cone beam computed tomography accurate for postoperative evaluation of implants? An in vitro study.
    Vidor MM; Liedke GS; Fontana MP; da Silveira HLD; Arus NA; Lemos A; Vizzotto MB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Nov; 124(5):500-505. PubMed ID: 28867464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of reconstructed images with different voxel sizes of acquisition in the diagnosis of simulated external root resorption using cone beam computed tomography.
    Neves FS; Vasconcelos TV; Vaz SL; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
    Int Endod J; 2012 Mar; 45(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 22003884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of voxel size on detection of fenestration, dehiscence and furcation defects using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Eftekhar M; Kaviani H; Rouzmeh N; Torabinia A; Akbarzadeh Baghban A
    Oral Radiol; 2021 Oct; 37(4):677-686. PubMed ID: 33432538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle.
    Patel A; Tee BC; Fields H; Jones E; Chaudhry J; Sun Z
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24485728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Accuracy analysis of alveolar dehiscence and fenestration of maxillary anterior teeth of Angle class III by cone-beam CT].
    Xu X; Xu L; Jiang JH; Wu JQ; Li XT; Jing WD
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 50(1):104-109. PubMed ID: 29483731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
    Dave M; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of a metal artifact reduction algorithm on dehiscence and fenestration detection around zirconia implants with cone beam computed tomography.
    Freire BB; Wanderley VA; Câmara JVF; Santos LA; Ferrari CR; Araujo TT; Chilvarquer I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38493025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of vertical root fractures in the presence of intracanal metallic post: a comparison between periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Junqueira RB; Verner FS; Campos CN; Devito KL; do Carmo AM
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1620-4. PubMed ID: 24238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the different voxel sizes in the estimation of peri-implant fenestration defects using cone beam computed tomography: an ex vivo study.
    Kurt MH; Bağış N; Evli C; Atakan C; Orhan K
    Int J Implant Dent; 2020 Oct; 6(1):58. PubMed ID: 33006000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of cone-beam computed tomography scan mode on the diagnostic yield of chemically simulated external root resorption.
    Sousa Melo SL; Vasconcelos KF; Holton N; Allareddy V; Allareddy V; Tabchoury CPM; Haiter-Neto F; Ruprecht A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1073-1082. PubMed ID: 28554453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems and Periapical Radiography for Detection of Fenestration Around Dental Implants.
    Eskandarloo A; Saati S; Ardakani MP; Jamalpour M; Gholi Mezerji NM; Akheshteh V
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):376-381. PubMed ID: 30166830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.