These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23218747)

  • 1. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings.
    Colpani JT; Borba M; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2013 Feb; 29(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 23218747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns.
    Tamac E; Toksavul S; Toman M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 24819532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
    Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique.
    Mously HA; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 24795263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques.
    Witkowski S; Komine F; Gerds T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16872930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal and Internal Fit of Conventional Metal-Ceramic and Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns.
    Nam SJ; Yoon MJ; Kim WH; Ryu GJ; Bang MK; Huh JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(5):519-21. PubMed ID: 26340013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol.
    Dahl BE; Rønold HJ; Dahl JE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):400-404. PubMed ID: 27692584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system.
    Souza RO; Özcan M; Pavanelli CA; Buso L; Lombardo GH; Michida SM; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb; 21(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 22050205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions.
    Tamim H; Skjerven H; Ekfeldt A; Rønold HJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 25010876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations.
    Bindl A; Mörmann WH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 32(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 15899023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps of metal ceramic crowns obtained from conventional impressions and casting techniques with those obtained from digital techniques.
    Rai R; Kumar SA; Prabhu R; Govindan RT; Tanveer FM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 28721994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of finish line design on marginal adaptation of electroformed metal-ceramic crowns.
    Shiratsuchi H; Komine F; Kakehashi Y; Matsumura H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 16543022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems.
    Balkaya MC; Cinar A; Pamuk S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):346-55. PubMed ID: 15798685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.