These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23218747)

  • 21. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems.
    Balkaya MC; Cinar A; Pamuk S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):346-55. PubMed ID: 15798685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28024815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An in vivo evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide based ceramic single crowns, generated with two CAD/CAM systems, in comparison to metal ceramic single crowns.
    Biscaro L; Bonfiglioli R; Soattin M; Vigolo P
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jan; 22(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22946875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings.
    Moldovan O; Luthardt RG; Corcodel N; Rudolph H
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1273-8. PubMed ID: 21983002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of metal selection and porcelain firing on the marginal accuracy of titanium-based metal ceramic restorations.
    Shokry TE; Attia M; Mosleh I; Elhosary M; Hamza T; Shen C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 20105684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
    Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single-crown fixed dental prostheses.
    Dahl BE; Dahl JE; Rønold HJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2018 Dec; 126(6):512-517. PubMed ID: 30298624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of the Adaptation of Interim Crowns using Different Measurement Techniques.
    Peng CC; Chung KH; Ramos V
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 31702087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations.
    Tan PL; Gratton DG; Diaz-Arnold AM; Holmes DC
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 18355167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Marginal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated by using a casting and two selective laser melting processes before and after ceramic firing.
    Hong MH; Min BK; Lee DH; Kwon TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):475-481. PubMed ID: 30982615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation in five ceramic restoration fabricating techniques.
    Ural C; Burgaz Y; Saraç D
    Quintessence Int; 2010; 41(7):585-90. PubMed ID: 20614046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of repeated firing on the marginal accuracy of Co-Cr copings fabricated by selective laser melting.
    Zeng L; Zhang Y; Liu Z; Wei B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 25444279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods.
    Peng CC; Chung KH; Yau HT; Ramos V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):514-522. PubMed ID: 31353116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Precision of fit of two margin designs for metal-ceramic crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 17451481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations.
    Holden JE; Goldstein GR; Hittelman EL; Clark EA
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 19682215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of marginal adaptation and internal fit of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns produced by 4 different CAD/CAM systems.
    Ferrairo BM; Piras FF; Lima FF; Honório HM; Duarte MAH; Borges AFS; Rubo JH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):2029-2036. PubMed ID: 32783095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns in CAD/CAM and lost-wax techniques in all fabrication stages through replica weighting, triple scanning, and scanning electron microscope.
    Sadr SM; Ahmadi E; Tabatabaei MH; Mohammadi S; Atri F
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Jun; 8(3):763-770. PubMed ID: 35187813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems.
    Hamza TA; Ezzat HA; El-Hossary MM; Katamish HA; Shokry TE; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 23395333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.