These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Nurses advocate for nurses. Trossman S Nebr Nurse; 2003 Dec; 36(4):6. PubMed ID: 14763457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. House takes stand against harassment, discrimination. Mikulencak M Am Nurse; 1992; 24(7):1, 13. PubMed ID: 1497203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrimination in employment--remedies--standards governing backpay awards for violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Piraino MS Cornell Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 61(3):460-77. PubMed ID: 10242508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Civil Rights Act of 1991. Siegel P; Sussman M Caring; 1992 Feb; 11(2):38-9. PubMed ID: 10170916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Braving new frontiers. ANA's economic and general welfare program, 1946-1986. Flanagan L ANA Publ; 1986 May; (EC-144):i-v, 1-30. PubMed ID: 3526968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nursing a fine line: patient privacy and sex discrimination. Hawke C Nurs Manage; 1998 Oct; 29(10):56-61. PubMed ID: 9814317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Every citizen deserves care and every patient deserves a nurse. Sharp N Nurs Manage; 1994 Sep; 25(9):32-3. PubMed ID: 8075948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New statutes may increase workforce concerns. Erf S Hospitals; 1990 Jul; 64(13):FB58, FB60. PubMed ID: 2141824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the Americans with Disabilities Act protecting cancer survivors from employment discrimination? Hoffman B Cancer Pract; 1997; 5(2):119-21. PubMed ID: 9110649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Senate votes penalties for health care workers. Richardson D; Arrindell DM Am Nurse; 1991 Sep; 23(8):7. PubMed ID: 1888091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Networking--it's who you know. Anderson J Am Nurse; 1992 Mar; 24(3):38. PubMed ID: 1543280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ANA voices opposition to 'gag rule'. Am Nurse; 1991; 23(7):10. PubMed ID: 1877788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Protection or discrimination? A new ruling. Scheutzow SO RN; 1991 Jul; 54(7):56, 58. PubMed ID: 2057681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]