BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23219164)

  • 1. Theory-informed design of values clarification methods: a cognitive psychological perspective on patient health-related decision making.
    Pieterse AH; de Vries M; Kunneman M; Stiggelbout AM; Feldman-Stewart D
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Jan; 77():156-63. PubMed ID: 23219164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The design of patient decision support interventions: addressing the theory-practice gap.
    Elwyn G; Stiel M; Durand MA; Boivin J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Aug; 17(4):565-74. PubMed ID: 20698918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision making and coping in healthcare: the Coping in Deliberation (CODE) framework.
    Witt J; Elwyn G; Wood F; Brain K
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Aug; 88(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 22465484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision support for patients: values clarification and preference elicitation.
    Llewellyn-Thomas HA; Crump RT
    Med Care Res Rev; 2013 Feb; 70(1 Suppl):50S-79S. PubMed ID: 23124615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of decision support technologies for amniocentesis.
    Durand MA; Boivin J; Elwyn G
    Hum Reprod Update; 2008; 14(6):659-68. PubMed ID: 18772266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design Features of Explicit Values Clarification Methods: A Systematic Review.
    Witteman HO; Scherer LD; Gavaruzzi T; Pieterse AH; Fuhrel-Forbis A; Chipenda Dansokho S; Exe N; Kahn VC; Feldman-Stewart D; Col NF; Turgeon AF; Fagerlin A
    Med Decis Making; 2016 May; 36(4):453-71. PubMed ID: 26826032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient explicit consideration of tradeoffs in decision making about rectal cancer treatment: benefits for decision process and quality of life.
    Pieterse AH; Kunneman M; van den Hout WB; Baas-Thijssen M; Geijsen ED; Ceha HM; Muller KM; van der Linden YM; Marijnen CAM; Stiggelbout AM
    Acta Oncol; 2019 Jul; 58(7):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 30971150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An introduction to patient decision aids.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2012 Aug; 50(8):90-2. PubMed ID: 22875365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions.
    Elwyn G; Frosch D; Volandes AE; Edwards A; Montori VM
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(6):701-11. PubMed ID: 21088131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clarifying values: an updated review.
    Fagerlin A; Pignone M; Abhyankar P; Col N; Feldman-Stewart D; Gavaruzzi T; Kryworuchko J; Levin CA; Pieterse AH; Reyna V; Stiggelbout A; Scherer LD; Wills C; Witteman HO
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2013; 13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S8. PubMed ID: 24625261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using decision aids may improve informed consent for research.
    Brehaut JC; Fergusson DA; Kimmelman J; Shojania KG; Saginur R; Elwyn G
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 May; 31(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 20156597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shared decision making in inflammatory bowel disease: helping patients understand the tradeoffs between treatment options.
    Siegel CA
    Gut; 2012 Mar; 61(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 22187072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the suitability of fast and frugal heuristics for designing values clarification methods in patient decision aids: a critical analysis.
    Pieterse AH; de Vries M
    Health Expect; 2013 Sep; 16(3):e73-9. PubMed ID: 21902770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there a role for decision aids in cancer-related decisions?
    Neuman HB; Charlson ME; Temple LK
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 17317206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.