62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23219194)
1. Detection and construction of chest wall on breast magnetic resonance images.
Gwo CY; Wei CH; Li Y; Huang PJ
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 82(4):e176-83. PubMed ID: 23219194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of breast contour for nipple segmentation in breast magnetic resonance images.
Gwo CY; Gwo A; Wei CH; Huang PJ
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):022304. PubMed ID: 24506642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of breast density: an adaptive moment preserving method for segmentation of fibroglandular tissue in breast magnetic resonance images.
Wei CH; Li Y; Huang PJ; Gwo CY; Harms SE
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e618-24. PubMed ID: 22266417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging appearances in the postoperative breast: the clinical target volume-tumor and its relationship to the chest wall.
Whipp EC; Halliwell M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Sep; 72(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 18440725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic estimation of the noise variance from the histogram of a magnetic resonance image.
Sijbers J; Poot D; den Dekker AJ; Pintjens W
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1335-48. PubMed ID: 17301458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging].
Eder M; Schneider A; Feussner H; Zimmermann A; Höhnke C; Papadopulos NA; Kovacs L
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Jun; 53(3):112-21. PubMed ID: 18601619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. STACS: new active contour scheme for cardiac MR image segmentation.
Pluempitiwiriyawej C; Moura JM; Fellow ; Wu YJ; Ho C
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):593-603. PubMed ID: 15889547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prior shape level set segmentation on multistep generated probability maps of MR datasets for fully automatic kidney parenchyma volumetry.
Gloger O; Tönies KD; Liebscher V; Kugelmann B; Laqua R; Völzke H
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Feb; 31(2):312-25. PubMed ID: 21937343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of chest wall invasion by lung cancer using respiratory dynamic MRI.
Akata S; Kajiwara N; Park J; Yoshimura M; Kakizaki D; Abe K; Hirano T; Ohira T; Tsuboi M; Kato H
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 18373824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A strategic approach for cardiac MR left ventricle segmentation.
Dakua SP; Sahambi JS
Cardiovasc Eng; 2010 Sep; 10(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 20809149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unifying framework for multimodal brain MRI segmentation based on Hidden Markov Chains.
Bricq S; Collet Ch; Armspach JP
Med Image Anal; 2008 Dec; 12(6):639-52. PubMed ID: 18440268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons.
Fan X; Abe H; Medved M; Foxley S; Arkani S; Zamora MA; Olopade OI; Newstead GM; Karczmar GS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17096393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Method to correct intensity inhomogeneity in MR images for atherosclerosis characterization.
Salvado O; Hillenbrand C; Zhang S; Wilson DL
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):539-52. PubMed ID: 16689259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.
Moon M; Cornfeld D; Weinreb J
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 May; 17(2):351-62. PubMed ID: 19406363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved lesion detection in MR mammography: three-dimensional segmentation, moving voxel sampling, and normalized maximum intensity-time ratio entropy.
Ertaş G; Gülçür HO; Tunaci M
Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 17236988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison and validation of tissue modelization and statistical classification methods in T1-weighted MR brain images.
Cuadra MB; Cammoun L; Butz T; Cuisenaire O; Thiran JP
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1548-65. PubMed ID: 16350916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
