These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23219518)

  • 1. Determination of monitor unit check tolerances based on a comparison with measurement and treatment planning system data.
    Curtis H; Richmond N; Burke K; Walker C
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 23219518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental verification of convolution/superposition photon dose calculations for radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Aspradakis MM; Morrison RH; Richmond ND; Steele A
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(17):2873-93. PubMed ID: 14516106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement and evaluation of inhomogeneity corrections and monitor unit verification for treatment planning.
    Saxena R; Higgins P
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 19931010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.
    Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Weber L; Ginjaume M; Eudaldo T; Jurado D; Ruiz A; Ribas M
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2899-911. PubMed ID: 15543799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Monte Carlo-based procedure for independent monitor unit calculation in IMRT treatment plans.
    Pisaturo O; Moeckli R; Mirimanoff RO; Bochud FO
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4299-310. PubMed ID: 19531844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm.
    Newhauser W; Fontenot J; Zheng Y; Polf J; Titt U; Koch N; Zhang X; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4569-84. PubMed ID: 17634651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
    Krieger T; Sauer OA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam.
    Koelbl O; Krieger T; Haedinger U; Sauer O; Flentje M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Dec; 180(12):783-8. PubMed ID: 15592698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient-specific IMRT verification using independent fluence-based dose calculation software: experimental benchmarking and initial clinical experience.
    Georg D; Stock M; Kroupa B; Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4981-92. PubMed ID: 17671348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of MU calculations for dynamic wedge with the Varian's Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm.
    Salomons GJ; Kerr AT; Mei X; Patel D
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4289-91. PubMed ID: 18975673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A separated primary and scatter model for independent dose calculation of intensity modulated radiotherapy.
    Baker CR; Clements R; Gately A; Budgell GJ
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Sep; 80(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 16956682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
    Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations.
    Knöös T; Wieslander E; Cozzi L; Brink C; Fogliata A; Albers D; Nyström H; Lassen S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5785-807. PubMed ID: 17068365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements.
    Edimo P; Clermont C; Kwato MG; Vynckier S
    Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling lateral beam quality variations in pencil kernel based photon dose calculations.
    Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(16):4111-8. PubMed ID: 16885628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].
    Treutwein M; Bogner L
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A modified simulated annealing algorithm for parameter determination for a hybrid virtual model.
    Carletti C; Meoli P; Cravero WR
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(16):3941-52. PubMed ID: 16885616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards an objective evaluation of tolerances for beam modeling in a treatment planning system.
    Rangel A; Ploquin N; Kay I; Dunscombe P
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):6011-25. PubMed ID: 17881816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stochastic versus deterministic kernel-based superposition approaches for dose calculation of intensity-modulated arcs.
    Tang G; Earl MA; Luan S; Wang C; Cao D; Yu CX; Naqvi SA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4733-46. PubMed ID: 18701770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.