135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23220309)
1. Antimicrobial effect of three new and two established root canal irrigation solutions.
Mohammadi Z; Shalavi S; Giardino L; Palazzi F; Mashouf RY; Soltanian A
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):534-7; quiz p.538-9. PubMed ID: 23220309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antimicrobial efficacy of nine different root canal irrigation solutions.
van der Vyver PJ; Botha FS; de Wet FA
SADJ; 2014 May; 69(4):158-60, 162-5. PubMed ID: 24984389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative antimicrobial analysis of various root canal irrigating solutions on endodontic pathogens: an in vitro study.
Misuriya A; Bhardwaj A; Bhardwaj A; Aggrawal S; Kumar PP; Gajjarepu S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Mar; 15(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 25095835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EFFECTS OF ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS ON THE PLANKTONIC FORM OF ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS: A REVIEW.
Mohammadi Z
Niger J Med; 2015; 24(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 27487599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activities of chlorhexidine gluconate, sodium hypochlorite and octenidine hydrochloride in vitro.
Tirali RE; Bodur H; Sipahi B; Sungurtekin E
Aust Endod J; 2013 Apr; 39(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 23551508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of initial irrigation with sodium hypochlorite on residual antibacterial activity of tetraclean.
Mohammadi Z; Giardino L; Palazzi F; Shahriari S
N Y State Dent J; 2013 Jan; 79(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 23513547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis, BioPure MTAD, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans.
Arslan S; Ozbilge H; Kaya EG; Er O
Saudi Med J; 2011 May; 32(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 21556468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antimicrobial activity of root canal irrigants associated with cetrimide against biofilm and planktonic Enterococcus faecalis.
Nascimento CA; Tanomaru-Filho M; Faria-Junior NB; Faria G; Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Sep; 15(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 25707833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Control of microorganisms in vitro by endodontic irrigants.
Estrela CR; Estrela C; Reis C; Bammann LL; Pécora JD
Braz Dent J; 2003; 14(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 15057395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Residual and antimicrobial activity of final irrigation protocols on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in dentin.
Baca P; Junco P; Arias-Moliz MT; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
J Endod; 2011 Mar; 37(3):363-6. PubMed ID: 21329822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inhibitory activity of root canal irrigants against Candida albicans, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus.
Fidalgo TK; Barcelos R; Portela MB; Soares RM; Gleiser R; Silva-Filho FC
Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 21180960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of phosphoric acid solution compared to other root canal irrigants.
Prado M; Silva EJ; Duque TM; Zaia AA; Ferraz CC; Almeida JF; Gomes BP
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 26018307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antifungal effects of root canal irrigants and medicaments. An update review.
Mohammadi Z; Shalavi S
N Y State Dent J; 2014; 80(5):58-63. PubMed ID: 25672081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro comparison of antimicrobial effcacy of three root canal irrigants-BioPure MTAD, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as a final rinse against E. faecalis.
Agrawal V; Rao MR; Dhingra K; Gopal VR; Mohapatra A; Mohapatra A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Sep; 14(5):842-7. PubMed ID: 24685785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antimicrobial effectiveness of combinations of oxidant and chelating agents in infected dentine: an ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy study.
Giardino L; Del Fabbro M; Cesario F; Fernandes FS; Andrade FB
Int Endod J; 2018 Apr; 51(4):448-456. PubMed ID: 28960350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of the antimicrobial effect of three irrigant solutions (chlorhexidine, sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidinated MUMS).
Bidar M; Hooshiar S; Naderinasab M; Moazzami M; Orafaee H; Naghavi N; Jafarzadeh H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):436-9. PubMed ID: 23151688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of Tetraclean against Candida albicans.
Qyasian A; Mohammadi Z; Giardino L; Palazzi F; Shalavi S; Sabbaghi S; Khoshbin E
Niger J Med; 2014; 23(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 25185376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SEM evaluation of the root canal walls after treatment with Tetraclean.
Poggio C; Dagna A; Chiesa M; Bianchi S; Arciola CR; Visai L; Giardino L
Int J Artif Organs; 2010 Sep; 33(9):660-6. PubMed ID: 20963730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Antimicrobial effect of 2% sodium hypochlorite and 2% chlorhexidine tested by different methods.
Estrela C; Ribeiro RG; Estrela CR; Pécora JD; Sousa-Neto MD
Braz Dent J; 2003; 14(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 12656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite.
Vianna ME; Gomes BP; Berber VB; Zaia AA; Ferraz CC; de Souza-Filho FJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Jan; 97(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 14716261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
