498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23220321)
1. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of light-curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of class v composite restorations.
Maia-Casseli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Cavalcanti AN; Romani EA; Martins LR
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2012; 25(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 22928384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SEM evaluation of marginal sealing on composite restorations using different photoactivation and composite insertion methods.
Lopes MB; Costa LA; Consani S; Gonini AJ; Sinhoreti MA
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 20139558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of light-emitting diode (LED) curing modes on resin/dentin bond strength.
Fahmy N; Naguib H; Guindy JE
J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):670-5. PubMed ID: 19682222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the curing method and composite volume on marginal and internal adaptation of composite restoratives.
Souza-Junior EJ; de Souza-Régis MR; Alonso RC; de Freitas AP; Sinhoreti MA; Cunha LG
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 21702671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
Attar N; Korkmaz Y
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Wegley C
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
Hofmann N; Hunecke A
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
Krejci I; Lutz F
J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of light-curing method and irradiation time on marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations.
Yoshikawa T; Nakaoki Y; Takada T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():63A-67A. PubMed ID: 14674502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
