190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23220555)
1. Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers.
Pabinger C; Berghold A; Boehler N; Labek G
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Feb; 21(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 23220555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Similar revision rates in clinical studies and arthroplasty registers and no bias for developer publications in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Hauer G; Bernhardt GA; Hohenberger G; Leitner L; Ruckenstuhl P; Leithner A; Gruber G; Sadoghi P
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Apr; 140(4):537-544. PubMed ID: 32036418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets.
Labek G; Thaler M; Janda W; Agreiter M; Stöckl B
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Mar; 93(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 21357948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: not always a slam dunk!
Sierra RJ; Kassel CA; Wetters NG; Berend KR; Della Valle CJ; Lombardi AV
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):128-32. PubMed ID: 23886408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement.
Baker PN; Petheram T; Avery PJ; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e126. PubMed ID: 22992855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty After Aseptic Revision to Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study of 768 TKAs and 578 UKAs Revised to TKAs from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (1994 to 2011).
Leta TH; Lygre SH; Skredderstuen A; Hallan G; Gjertsen JE; Rokne B; Furnes O
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(6):431-40. PubMed ID: 26984910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of published outcome data concerning Anatomic Graduated Component total knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty register data.
Schuh R; Dorninger G; Agreiter M; Boehler N; Labek G
Int Orthop; 2012 Jan; 36(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 21487670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of implant developers on published outcome and reproducibility of cohort-based clinical studies in arthroplasty.
Labek G; Neumann D; Agreiter M; Schuh R; Böhler N
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 22262425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early outcomes of twin-peg mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty.
Lum ZC; Lombardi AV; Hurst JM; Morris MJ; Adams JB; Berend KR
Bone Joint J; 2016 Oct; 98-B(10 Supple B):28-33. PubMed ID: 27694513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone loss during revision of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of implanted polyethylene thickness from the National Joint Registry data.
Sarraf KM; Konan S; Pastides PS; Haddad FS; Oussedik S
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1571-4. PubMed ID: 23538124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The incidence of implant fractures after knee arthroplasty.
Gilg MM; Zeller CW; Leitner L; Leithner A; Labek G; Sadoghi P
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Oct; 24(10):3272-3279. PubMed ID: 27154281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Compartment Arthritis in Patients Older Than 75 Years: Comparable Reoperation, Revision, and Complication Rates.
Siman H; Kamath AF; Carrillo N; Harmsen WS; Pagnano MW; Sierra RJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1792-1797. PubMed ID: 28215968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of revision rates and epidemiological data of a single total knee arthroplasty system of different designs (cruciate retaining, posterior stabilized, mobile bearing, and fixed bearing): a meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical trials and national arthroplasty registries.
Wagner A; Wittig U; Leitner L; Vielgut I; Hauer G; Ortmaier R; Leithner A; Sadoghi P
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 May; 144(5):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 38570357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers.
Sadoghi P; Liebensteiner M; Agreiter M; Leithner A; Böhler N; Labek G
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8):1329-32. PubMed ID: 23602418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is there a difference in total knee arthroplasty risk of revision in highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene?
Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Kurtz S; Love R; Cafri G; Namba RS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar; 473(3):999-1008. PubMed ID: 25567357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry.
Gioe TJ; Novak C; Sinner P; Ma W; Mehle S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Nov; 464():83-7. PubMed ID: 17589362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of outcome data in knee arthroplasty.
Pabinger C; Lumenta DB; Cupak D; Berghold A; Boehler N; Labek G
Acta Orthop; 2015 Feb; 86(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 25191934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of unicondylar versus total knee arthroplasty: a Markov model analysis.
Peersman G; Jak W; Vandenlangenbergh T; Jans C; Cartier P; Fennema P
Knee; 2014; 21 Suppl 1():S37-42. PubMed ID: 25382367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register Telephone Survey of 2769 Patients Operated for Total Knee Replacement.
Terteliene E; Grigaitis K; Robertsson O; Porvaneckas N; Dadoniene J; Venalis A
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Jun; 55(6):. PubMed ID: 31242685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Five-Year Survival of 20,946 Unicondylar Knee Replacements and Patient Risk Factors for Failure: An Analysis of German Insurance Data.
Jeschke E; Gehrke T; Günster C; Hassenpflug J; Malzahn J; Niethard FU; Schräder P; Zacher J; Halder A
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(20):1691-1698. PubMed ID: 27869619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
