These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23220555)

  • 1. Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers.
    Pabinger C; Berghold A; Boehler N; Labek G
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Feb; 21(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 23220555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Similar revision rates in clinical studies and arthroplasty registers and no bias for developer publications in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Hauer G; Bernhardt GA; Hohenberger G; Leitner L; Ruckenstuhl P; Leithner A; Gruber G; Sadoghi P
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Apr; 140(4):537-544. PubMed ID: 32036418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets.
    Labek G; Thaler M; Janda W; Agreiter M; Stöckl B
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Mar; 93(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 21357948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: not always a slam dunk!
    Sierra RJ; Kassel CA; Wetters NG; Berend KR; Della Valle CJ; Lombardi AV
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):128-32. PubMed ID: 23886408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement.
    Baker PN; Petheram T; Avery PJ; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e126. PubMed ID: 22992855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty After Aseptic Revision to Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study of 768 TKAs and 578 UKAs Revised to TKAs from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (1994 to 2011).
    Leta TH; Lygre SH; Skredderstuen A; Hallan G; Gjertsen JE; Rokne B; Furnes O
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(6):431-40. PubMed ID: 26984910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of published outcome data concerning Anatomic Graduated Component total knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty register data.
    Schuh R; Dorninger G; Agreiter M; Boehler N; Labek G
    Int Orthop; 2012 Jan; 36(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 21487670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of implant developers on published outcome and reproducibility of cohort-based clinical studies in arthroplasty.
    Labek G; Neumann D; Agreiter M; Schuh R; Böhler N
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 22262425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early outcomes of twin-peg mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty.
    Lum ZC; Lombardi AV; Hurst JM; Morris MJ; Adams JB; Berend KR
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Oct; 98-B(10 Supple B):28-33. PubMed ID: 27694513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone loss during revision of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of implanted polyethylene thickness from the National Joint Registry data.
    Sarraf KM; Konan S; Pastides PS; Haddad FS; Oussedik S
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1571-4. PubMed ID: 23538124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation of revision rate of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty registers.
    Obermayr S; Klasan A; Rasic L; Hauer G; Leitner L; Leithner A; Sadoghi P
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Nov; 144(11):4873-4886. PubMed ID: 39404769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The incidence of implant fractures after knee arthroplasty.
    Gilg MM; Zeller CW; Leitner L; Leithner A; Labek G; Sadoghi P
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Oct; 24(10):3272-3279. PubMed ID: 27154281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Compartment Arthritis in Patients Older Than 75 Years: Comparable Reoperation, Revision, and Complication Rates.
    Siman H; Kamath AF; Carrillo N; Harmsen WS; Pagnano MW; Sierra RJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1792-1797. PubMed ID: 28215968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of revision rates and epidemiological data of a single total knee arthroplasty system of different designs (cruciate retaining, posterior stabilized, mobile bearing, and fixed bearing): a meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical trials and national arthroplasty registries.
    Wagner A; Wittig U; Leitner L; Vielgut I; Hauer G; Ortmaier R; Leithner A; Sadoghi P
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 May; 144(5):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 38570357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers.
    Sadoghi P; Liebensteiner M; Agreiter M; Leithner A; Böhler N; Labek G
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8):1329-32. PubMed ID: 23602418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a difference in total knee arthroplasty risk of revision in highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene?
    Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Kurtz S; Love R; Cafri G; Namba RS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar; 473(3):999-1008. PubMed ID: 25567357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry.
    Gioe TJ; Novak C; Sinner P; Ma W; Mehle S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Nov; 464():83-7. PubMed ID: 17589362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of outcome data in knee arthroplasty.
    Pabinger C; Lumenta DB; Cupak D; Berghold A; Boehler N; Labek G
    Acta Orthop; 2015 Feb; 86(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 25191934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of unicondylar versus total knee arthroplasty: a Markov model analysis.
    Peersman G; Jak W; Vandenlangenbergh T; Jans C; Cartier P; Fennema P
    Knee; 2014; 21 Suppl 1():S37-42. PubMed ID: 25382367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register Telephone Survey of 2769 Patients Operated for Total Knee Replacement.
    Terteliene E; Grigaitis K; Robertsson O; Porvaneckas N; Dadoniene J; Venalis A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Jun; 55(6):. PubMed ID: 31242685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.