These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23220891)

  • 1. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part II. Comparison of intra- and interobserver variability with manual region of interest placement versus semiautomatic lesion segmentation and histogram analysis.
    Heye T; Merkle EM; Reiner CS; Davenport MS; Horvath JJ; Feuerlein S; Breault SR; Gall P; Bashir MR; Dale BM; Kiraly AP; Boll DT
    Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):812-21. PubMed ID: 23220891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part I. Perfusion characteristics in the female pelvis by using multiple computer-aided diagnosis perfusion analysis solutions.
    Heye T; Davenport MS; Horvath JJ; Feuerlein S; Breault SR; Bashir MR; Merkle EM; Boll DT
    Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):801-11. PubMed ID: 23220897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter- and intra-rater reproducibility of quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using TWIST perfusion data in a uterine fibroid model.
    Davenport MS; Heye T; Dale BM; Horvath JJ; Breault SR; Feuerlein S; Bashir MR; Boll DT; Merkle EM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 23239041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurements in renal cell carcinoma: effect of region of interest size and positioning on interobserver and intraobserver variability.
    Braunagel M; Radler E; Ingrisch M; Staehler M; Schmid-Tannwald C; Rist C; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Notohamiprodjo M
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Jan; 50(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 25260094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Liver segmentation in living liver transplant donors: comparison of semiautomatic and manual methods.
    Hermoye L; Laamari-Azjal I; Cao Z; Annet L; Lerut J; Dawant BM; Van Beers BE
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 15564393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semiautomatic determination of arterial input functions for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
    Chung J; Kim JH; Lee EJ; Kim YN; Yi CA
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Mar; 50(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 25369854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: model selection, reproducibility, and validation.
    Gaens ME; Backes WH; Rozel S; Lipperts M; Sanders SN; Jaspers K; Cleutjens JP; Sluimer JC; Heeneman S; Daemen MJ; Welten RJ; Daemen JW; Wildberger JE; Kwee RM; Kooi ME
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):271-9. PubMed ID: 23151823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
    Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can voxel based morphometry, manual segmentation and automated segmentation equally detect hippocampal volume differences in acute depression?
    Bergouignan L; Chupin M; Czechowska Y; Kinkingnéhun S; Lemogne C; Le Bastard G; Lepage M; Garnero L; Colliot O; Fossati P
    Neuroimage; 2009 Mar; 45(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 19071222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.
    Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 16399033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left ventricle: automated segmentation by using myocardial effusion threshold reduction and intravoxel computation at MR imaging.
    Codella NC; Weinsaft JW; Cham MD; Janik M; Prince MR; Wang Y
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):1004-12. PubMed ID: 18710989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Solid pancreatic lesions: characterization by using timing bolus dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging assessment--a preliminary study.
    Kim JH; Lee JM; Park JH; Kim SC; Joo I; Han JK; Choi BI
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):185-96. PubMed ID: 23192779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of precontrast T10 relaxation times on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI pharmacokinetic parameters: T10 mapping versus a fixed T10 reference value.
    Heye T; Boll DT; Reiner CS; Bashir MR; Dale BM; Merkle EM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1136-45. PubMed ID: 25006630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semiautomatic parametric model-based 3D lesion segmentation for evaluation of MR-guided radiofrequency ablation therapy.
    Lazebnik RS; Weinberg BD; Breen MS; Lewin JS; Wilson DL
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1491-501. PubMed ID: 16321737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: why we should care.
    Goh V; Schaeffter T; Leach M
    Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):698-700. PubMed ID: 23431225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Study of inter-software accuracy and reproducibility using simulated and clinical data.
    Beuzit L; Eliat PA; Brun V; Ferré JC; Gandon Y; Bannier E; Saint-Jalmes H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1288-300. PubMed ID: 26687041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging.
    Hoeks CM; Hambrock T; Yakar D; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Feuth T; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):207-17. PubMed ID: 23143029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hepatic tumors: region-of-interest versus volumetric analysis for quantification of attenuation at CT.
    Chalian H; Tochetto SM; Töre HG; Rezai P; Yaghmai V
    Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):853-61. PubMed ID: 22357887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cerebral blood volume analysis in glioblastomas using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI: a comparison of manual and semiautomatic segmentation methods.
    Jung SC; Choi SH; Yeom JA; Kim JH; Ryoo I; Kim SC; Shin H; Lee AL; Yun TJ; Park CK; Sohn CH; Park SH
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e69323. PubMed ID: 23950891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of semiautomatic measurement of the extent of breast tumors using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Alderliesten T; Schlief A; Peterse J; Loo C; Teertstra H; Muller S; Gilhuijs K
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Jan; 42(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 17213748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.