269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23220891)
1. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part II. Comparison of intra- and interobserver variability with manual region of interest placement versus semiautomatic lesion segmentation and histogram analysis.
Heye T; Merkle EM; Reiner CS; Davenport MS; Horvath JJ; Feuerlein S; Breault SR; Gall P; Bashir MR; Dale BM; Kiraly AP; Boll DT
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):812-21. PubMed ID: 23220891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part I. Perfusion characteristics in the female pelvis by using multiple computer-aided diagnosis perfusion analysis solutions.
Heye T; Davenport MS; Horvath JJ; Feuerlein S; Breault SR; Bashir MR; Merkle EM; Boll DT
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):801-11. PubMed ID: 23220897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter- and intra-rater reproducibility of quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using TWIST perfusion data in a uterine fibroid model.
Davenport MS; Heye T; Dale BM; Horvath JJ; Breault SR; Feuerlein S; Bashir MR; Boll DT; Merkle EM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 23239041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurements in renal cell carcinoma: effect of region of interest size and positioning on interobserver and intraobserver variability.
Braunagel M; Radler E; Ingrisch M; Staehler M; Schmid-Tannwald C; Rist C; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Notohamiprodjo M
Invest Radiol; 2015 Jan; 50(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 25260094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Liver segmentation in living liver transplant donors: comparison of semiautomatic and manual methods.
Hermoye L; Laamari-Azjal I; Cao Z; Annet L; Lerut J; Dawant BM; Van Beers BE
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 15564393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Semiautomatic determination of arterial input functions for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Chung J; Kim JH; Lee EJ; Kim YN; Yi CA
Invest Radiol; 2015 Mar; 50(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 25369854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: model selection, reproducibility, and validation.
Gaens ME; Backes WH; Rozel S; Lipperts M; Sanders SN; Jaspers K; Cleutjens JP; Sluimer JC; Heeneman S; Daemen MJ; Welten RJ; Daemen JW; Wildberger JE; Kwee RM; Kooi ME
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):271-9. PubMed ID: 23151823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can voxel based morphometry, manual segmentation and automated segmentation equally detect hippocampal volume differences in acute depression?
Bergouignan L; Chupin M; Czechowska Y; Kinkingnéhun S; Lemogne C; Le Bastard G; Lepage M; Garnero L; Colliot O; Fossati P
Neuroimage; 2009 Mar; 45(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 19071222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 16399033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Left ventricle: automated segmentation by using myocardial effusion threshold reduction and intravoxel computation at MR imaging.
Codella NC; Weinsaft JW; Cham MD; Janik M; Prince MR; Wang Y
Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):1004-12. PubMed ID: 18710989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Solid pancreatic lesions: characterization by using timing bolus dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging assessment--a preliminary study.
Kim JH; Lee JM; Park JH; Kim SC; Joo I; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):185-96. PubMed ID: 23192779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of precontrast T10 relaxation times on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI pharmacokinetic parameters: T10 mapping versus a fixed T10 reference value.
Heye T; Boll DT; Reiner CS; Bashir MR; Dale BM; Merkle EM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1136-45. PubMed ID: 25006630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semiautomatic parametric model-based 3D lesion segmentation for evaluation of MR-guided radiofrequency ablation therapy.
Lazebnik RS; Weinberg BD; Breen MS; Lewin JS; Wilson DL
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1491-501. PubMed ID: 16321737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: why we should care.
Goh V; Schaeffter T; Leach M
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):698-700. PubMed ID: 23431225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Study of inter-software accuracy and reproducibility using simulated and clinical data.
Beuzit L; Eliat PA; Brun V; Ferré JC; Gandon Y; Bannier E; Saint-Jalmes H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1288-300. PubMed ID: 26687041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging.
Hoeks CM; Hambrock T; Yakar D; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Feuth T; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):207-17. PubMed ID: 23143029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hepatic tumors: region-of-interest versus volumetric analysis for quantification of attenuation at CT.
Chalian H; Tochetto SM; Töre HG; Rezai P; Yaghmai V
Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):853-61. PubMed ID: 22357887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cerebral blood volume analysis in glioblastomas using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI: a comparison of manual and semiautomatic segmentation methods.
Jung SC; Choi SH; Yeom JA; Kim JH; Ryoo I; Kim SC; Shin H; Lee AL; Yun TJ; Park CK; Sohn CH; Park SH
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e69323. PubMed ID: 23950891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of semiautomatic measurement of the extent of breast tumors using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Alderliesten T; Schlief A; Peterse J; Loo C; Teertstra H; Muller S; Gilhuijs K
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jan; 42(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 17213748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
