344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23220903)
1. Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma.
Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Heerdt AS; Thornton C; Moskowitz CS; Ferrara J; Morris EA
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):743-51. PubMed ID: 23220903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Extent of Disease.
Lee-Felker SA; Tekchandani L; Thomas M; Gupta E; Andrews-Tang D; Roth A; Sayre J; Rahbar G
Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):389-400. PubMed ID: 28654337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging.
Sogani J; Morris EA; Kaplan JB; D'Alessio D; Goldman D; Moskowitz CS; Jochelson MS
Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 27379544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis--a feasibility study.
Carton AK; Gavenonis SC; Currivan JA; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
Br J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 83(988):344-50. PubMed ID: 19505964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013.
Badr S; Laurent N; Régis C; Boulanger L; Lemaille S; Poncelet E
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Mar; 95(3):245-58. PubMed ID: 24238816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.
Sung JS; Lebron L; Keating D; D'Alessio D; Comstock CE; Lee CH; Pike MC; Ayhan M; Moskowitz CS; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31453765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast.
Berg WA; Madsen KS; Schilling K; Tartar M; Pisano ED; Larsen LH; Narayanan D; Ozonoff A; Miller JP; Kalinyak JE
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 21076089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility.
Lewin JM; Isaacs PK; Vance V; Larke FJ
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):261-8. PubMed ID: 12888621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: examination protocol.
Barra FR; Ribeiro AC; Mathieu OD; Rodrigues AC
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Mar; 95(3):351-2. PubMed ID: 24581728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Performance of and Breast Tissue Changes at Early Breast MR Imaging Surveillance in Women after Breast Conservation Therapy.
Kim EJ; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Youn IK; Baek JE; Lee HS
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):656-666. PubMed ID: 28419815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results.
Sung JS; Stamler S; Brooks J; Kaplan J; Huang T; Dershaw DD; Lee CH; Morris EA; Comstock CE
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 27097237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast MR imaging screening in women with a history of breast conservation therapy.
Gweon HM; Cho N; Han W; Yi A; Moon HG; Noh DY; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 24635678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicentric Cancer Detected at Breast MR Imaging and Not at Mammography: Important or Not?
Iacconi C; Galman L; Zheng J; Sacchini V; Sutton EJ; Dershaw D; Morris EA
Radiology; 2016 May; 279(2):378-84. PubMed ID: 26605912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Initial Experience of Using Dual-Energy CT with an Iodine Overlay Image for Hand Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparison Study with Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging.
Fukuda T; Umezawa Y; Tojo S; Yonenaga T; Asahina A; Nakagawa H; Fukuda K
Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):134-142. PubMed ID: 28045646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening breast MR imaging in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ.
Sung JS; Malak SF; Bajaj P; Alis R; Dershaw DD; Morris EA
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):414-20. PubMed ID: 21900617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative assessment of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography of diagnosed breast cancers after sonographic biopsy: Correlation to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and 5-year postoperative follow-up.
Cheung YC; Juan YH; Lo YF; Lin YC; Yeh CH; Ueng SH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jan; 99(5):e19024. PubMed ID: 32000448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-enhanced MR mammography: gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Occhiato R; Venditti F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 16126926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
