These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2322156)
1. Reproducibility of normal corneal power measurements with a keratometer, photokeratoscope, and video imaging system. Hannush SB; Crawford SL; Waring GO; Gemmill MC; Lynn MJ; Nizam A Arch Ophthalmol; 1990 Apr; 108(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 2322156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and precision of keratometry, photokeratoscopy, and corneal modeling on calibrated steel balls. Hannush SB; Crawford SL; Waring GO; Gemmill MC; Lynn MJ; Nizam A Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Aug; 107(8):1235-9. PubMed ID: 2757555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I. Koch DD; Wakil JS; Samuelson SW; Haft EA J Cataract Refract Surg; 1992 Jul; 18(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 1501084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative PAR corneal topography system (CTS): comparison of its keratometric readings to manual keratometer, auto-keratometer, EyeSys Corneal Analysis system, and slit lamp PAR CTS in healthy eyes. Uçakhan OO; Sternberg G; Bodian C; Kelliher K; Asbell PA CLAO J; 2000 Jul; 26(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 10946987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-assisted corneal topography: accuracy and reproducibility of the topographic modeling system. Legeais JM; Ren Q; Simon G; Parel JM Refract Corneal Surg; 1993; 9(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 8241039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices. Shirayama M; Wang L; Weikert MP; Koch DD Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 148(4):528-535.e1. PubMed ID: 19541287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Measurement of the radius of corneal curvature with the Maloney surgical keratometer and an on-line keratometer imagery processing system]. Igarashi S; Yoshida A; Igarashi H; Kojima M Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jan; 97(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 8434540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the EyeSys model II computerized videokeratoscope. Part I: Clinical assessment. Dave T; Ruston D; Fowler C Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Sep; 75(9):647-55. PubMed ID: 9778697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of refractive outcomes using five devices for the assessment of preoperative corneal power. Whang WJ; Byun YS; Joo CK Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Jul; 40(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 22394318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and precision of the corneal analysis system and the topographic modeling system. Wilson SE; Verity SM; Conger DL Cornea; 1992 Jan; 11(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 1559344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of corneal curvature after corneal transplantation and radial keratotomy using standard and automated keratometry. Binder PS CLAO J; 1989; 15(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 2673574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability of corneal topography: the "corneal field". Zadnik K; Friedman NE; Mutti DO J Refract Surg; 1995; 11(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 7634141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of corneal topography: past, present and future trends. Morrow GL; Stein RM Can J Ophthalmol; 1992 Aug; 27(5):213-25. PubMed ID: 1393805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of corneal image-forming properties from corneal topography. Maloney RK; Bogan SJ; Waring GO Am J Ophthalmol; 1993 Jan; 115(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 8420375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]