These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

32 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23222648)

  • 1. Effect of patient-specific factors on regeneration in lumbar spine at healthy disc and total disc replacement. Computer simulation.
    Eremina GM; Smolin AY
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jun; 250():108172. PubMed ID: 38669718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A partial hemi-resurfacing preliminary study of a novel magnetic resonance imaging compatible polyetheretherketone mini-prosthesis for focal osteochondral defects.
    Meng X; Zhang W; Yuan Z; Chen J; Lyu Z; Wang Y
    J Orthop Translat; 2021 Jan; 26():67-73. PubMed ID: 33437625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Percutaneous removal and replacement of a novel percutaneous interspinous device.
    Marcia S; Hirsch JA; Bellini M; Manfré L; Masala S; Zini C
    Neuroradiol J; 2023 Nov; ():19714009231212366. PubMed ID: 37921595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of manually facilitated flexion of the thoracic spine on the interspinous space among horses with impinging dorsal spinous processes of the thoracic vertebrae.
    O'Sullivan S; McGowan CM; Junnila J; Hyytiäinen HK
    Vet J; 2022 Nov; 289():105909. PubMed ID: 36182065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correction to: Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a new percutaneous interspinous device: a retrospective multicenter study.
    Marcia S; Hirsch JA; Bellini M; Sadotti G; Manfré L; De Vivo AE; Piras E; Zini G; Zini C
    Neuroradiology; 2024 Jun; 66(6):1057. PubMed ID: 38653783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interspinous process stabilization with Rocker via unilateral approach versus X-Stop via bilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study.
    Huang W; Chang Z; Zhang J; Song R; Yu X
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Nov; 16():328. PubMed ID: 26522063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication?
    Landi A
    World J Clin Cases; 2014 Sep; 2(9):402-8. PubMed ID: 25232541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safe clinical use of carbon nanotubes as innovative biomaterials.
    Saito N; Haniu H; Usui Y; Aoki K; Hara K; Takanashi S; Shimizu M; Narita N; Okamoto M; Kobayashi S; Nomura H; Kato H; Nishimura N; Taruta S; Endo M
    Chem Rev; 2014 Jun; 114(11):6040-79. PubMed ID: 24720563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanics of interspinous devices.
    Parchi PD; Evangelisti G; Vertuccio A; Piolanti N; Andreani L; Cervi V; Giannetti C; Calvosa G; Lisanti M
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():839325. PubMed ID: 25114923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motion preservation surgery in the spine.
    Murtagh R; Castellvi AE
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2014 May; 24(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 24792608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histomorphometric and radiographical changes after lumbar implantation of the PEEK nonfusion interspinous device in the BB.4S rat model.
    Barz T; Lange J; Melloh M; Staub LP; Merk HR; Klöting I; Follak N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):E263-9. PubMed ID: 23222648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total disc replacement arthroplasty using the AcroFlex lumbar disc: a non-human primate model.
    Cunningham BW; Lowery GL; Serhan HA; Dmitriev AE; Orbegoso CM; McAfee PC; Fraser RD; Ross RE; Kulkarni SS
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Oct; 11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S115-23. PubMed ID: 12384732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone resorption during the first year after implantation of a single-segment dynamic interspinous stabilization device and its risk factors.
    Wang K; Zhu Z; Wang B; Zhu Y; Liu H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 May; 16():117. PubMed ID: 25971589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical effect of bone resorption of the spinous process after single-segment interspinous dynamic stabilization device implantation: A finite element analysis.
    Zhu ZQ; Duan S; Wang KF; Liu HY; Xu S; Liu CJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(27):e11140. PubMed ID: 29979380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical study of dynamic changes in L4-L5 foramen surface area in flexion and extension after implantation of four interspinous process devices.
    Hirsch C; Breque C; Ragot S; Pascal-Mousselard H; Richer JP; Scepi M; Khiami F
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Apr; 101(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 25736197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.