317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23222832)
1. Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): measuring undergraduates' evaluation of scientific information and arguments.
Gormally C; Brickman P; Lutz M
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2012; 11(4):364-77. PubMed ID: 23222832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Student performance on the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) does not change with assignment of a low-stakes grade.
Segarra VA; Hughes NM; Ackerman KM; Grider MH; Lyda T; Vigueira PA
BMC Res Notes; 2018 Jul; 11(1):422. PubMed ID: 29970190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Teens learning epidemiology? A cohort study on epidemiology instruction for high school youth.
D'Agostino EM
Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 47():8-12. PubMed ID: 32713507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills Reveals That Fundamental Literacy Is an Important Contributor to Scientific Literacy.
Shaffer JF; Ferguson J; Denaro K
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Sep; 18(3):ar31. PubMed ID: 31397654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Student-Driven Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CUREs) Projects in Identifying Vaginal Microorganism Species Communities to Promote Scientific Literacy Skills.
Yang Y; Wang M; Sang WL; Zhang YY; Liu W; Wu SF
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():870301. PubMed ID: 35570970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integration of information and scientific literacy: promoting literacy in undergraduates.
Porter JA; Wolbach KC; Purzycki CB; Bowman LA; Agbada E; Mostrom AM
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 21123700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The development and implementation of an instrument to assess students' data analysis skills in molecular biology.
Rybarczyk BJ; Walton KL; Grillo WH
J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2014 Dec; 15(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 25574292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of a research-infused botanical curriculum on undergraduates' content knowledge, STEM competencies, and attitudes toward plant sciences.
Ward JR; Clarke HD; Horton JL
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 25185223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Expert-Novice Comparison Reveals Pedagogical Implications for Students' Analysis of Primary Literature.
Nelms AA; Segura-Totten M
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Dec; 18(4):ar56. PubMed ID: 31675277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Guiding students to develop an understanding of scientific inquiry: a science skills approach to instruction and assessment.
Stone EM
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 24591508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates' perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science.
Brownell SE; Price JV; Steinman L
Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Mar; 37(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 23471252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and evaluation of a genetics literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates.
Bowling BV; Acra EE; Wang L; Myers MF; Dean GE; Markle GC; Moskalik CL; Huether CA
Genetics; 2008 Jan; 178(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 18202354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doing peer review and receiving feedback: impact on scientific literacy and writing skills.
Geithner CA; Pollastro AN
Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Mar; 40(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26847256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementing goals for non-cognitive outcomes within a basic science course.
Derstine PL
Acad Med; 2002 Sep; 77(9):931-2. PubMed ID: 12228102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biological inquiry: a new course and assessment plan in response to the call to transform undergraduate biology.
Goldey ES; Abercrombie CL; Ivy TM; Kusher DI; Moeller JF; Rayner DA; Smith CF; Spivey NW
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2012; 11(4):353-63. PubMed ID: 23222831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Teaching the process of science: faculty perceptions and an effective methodology.
Coil D; Wenderoth MP; Cunningham M; Dirks C
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(4):524-35. PubMed ID: 21123699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The annotated bibliography and citation behavior: enhancing student scholarship in an undergraduate biology course.
Flaspohler MR; Rux EM; Flaspohler JA
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(4):350-60. PubMed ID: 18056306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An introductory biology research-rich laboratory course shows improvements in students' research skills, confidence, and attitudes.
Pavlova IV; Remington DL; Horton M; Tomlin E; Hens MD; Chen D; Willse J; Schug MD
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261278. PubMed ID: 34914796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Curriculum Alignment with
Auerbach AJ; Schussler EE
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28495933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]