These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23222835)

  • 21. Learning Introductory Biology: Students' Concept-Building Approaches Predict Transfer on Biology Exams.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill MJ; Frey RF; Limeri LB; Lemons PP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2022 Dec; 21(4):ar65. PubMed ID: 36112624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Requiring students to justify answer changes during collaborative testing may be necessary for improved academic performance.
    Zhang N; Henderson CNR
    J Chiropr Educ; 2017 Oct; 31(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 28157390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Student use of out-of-class study groups in an introductory undergraduate biology course.
    Rybczynski SM; Schussler EE
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 21364102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class.
    Moravec M; Williams A; Aguilar-Roca N; O'Dowd DK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 21123694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of a knowledge survey as an indicator of student learning in an introductory biology course.
    Bowers N; Brandon M; Hill CD
    Cell Biol Educ; 2005; 4(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 16341258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Students' Use of Optional Online Reviews and Its Relationship to Summative Assessment Outcomes in Introductory Biology.
    Carpenter SK; Rahman S; Lund TJ; Armstrong PI; Lamm MH; Reason RD; Coffman CR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28408408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Participation in Voluntary Re-quizzing Is Predictive of Increased Performance on Cumulative Assessments in Introductory Biology.
    Walck-Shannon EM; Cahill MJ; McDaniel MA; Frey RF
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Jun; 18(2):ar15. PubMed ID: 31025914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using the web to encourage student-generated questions in large-format introductory biology classes.
    Colbert JT; Olson JK; Clough MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17339393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Verbal final exam in introductory biology yields gains in student content knowledge and longitudinal performance.
    Luckie DB; Rivkin AM; Aubry JR; Marengo BJ; Creech LR; Sweeder RD
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(3):515-29. PubMed ID: 24006399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breaking the mold: Study strategies of students who improve their achievement on introductory biology exams.
    Sebesta AJ; Bray Speth E
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0287313. PubMed ID: 37399176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The grass isn't always greener: perceptions of and performance on open-note exams.
    Sato BK; He W; Warschauer M; Kadandale P
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 25828402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of a novel group-centered testing schema in an upper-level undergraduate molecular biotechnology course.
    Srougi MC; Miller HB; Witherow DS; Carson S
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2013; 41(4):232-41. PubMed ID: 23868378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Promoting an active form of learning out-of-class via answering online "study questions" leads to higher than expected exam scores in General Biology.
    Gibson SI
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1322. PubMed ID: 26500828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Writing about testing worries boosts exam performance in the classroom.
    Ramirez G; Beilock SL
    Science; 2011 Jan; 331(6014):211-3. PubMed ID: 21233387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Supporting Undergraduate Biology Students' Academic Success: Comparing Two Workshop Interventions.
    Hensley L; Kulesza A; Peri J; Brady AC; Wolters CA; Sovic D; Breitenberger C
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2021 Dec; 20(4):ar60. PubMed ID: 34605666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology.
    Freeman S; Haak D; Wenderoth MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 21633066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effectiveness of a Low-Cost, Graduate Student-Led Intervention on Study Habits and Performance in Introductory Biology.
    Hoskins TD; Gantz JD; Chaffee BR; Arlinghaus K; Wiebler J; Hughes M; Fernandes JJ
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 28747353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of exam retakes on future exam performance in a large classroom setting.
    Davis JT; Adams K; Morgan A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2024 Dec; 48(4):685-689. PubMed ID: 39291938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Writing Assignments with a Metacognitive Component Enhance Learning in a Large Introductory Biology Course.
    Mynlieff M; Manogaran AL; St Maurice M; Eddinger TJ
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 26086661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Asynchronous lecture participation negatively predicts exam scores for females and students of color in an introductory physiology course during COVID-19.
    Zhou HD; Walker JD; Olson D
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2024 Jun; 48(2):254-259. PubMed ID: 38328812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.