These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23223754)
1. Communicating public health advice after a chemical spill: results from national surveys in the United Kingdom and Poland. Pearce JM; Rubin GJ; Amlôt R; Wessely S; Rogers MB Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2013 Feb; 7(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 23223754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Communicating with the public following radiological terrorism: results from a series of focus groups and national surveys in Britain and Germany. Pearce JM; Rubin GJ; Selke P; Amlôt R; Mowbray F; Rogers MB Prehosp Disaster Med; 2013 Apr; 28(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 23259975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Communication, perception and behaviour during a natural disaster involving a 'Do Not Drink' and a subsequent 'Boil Water' notice: a postal questionnaire study. Rundblad G; Knapton O; Hunter PR BMC Public Health; 2010 Oct; 10():641. PubMed ID: 20973959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents? Ingram RJ Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):208-213. PubMed ID: 30086017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public Perceptions of the "Remove, Remove, Remove" Information Campaign Before and During a Hazardous Materials Incident: A Survey. Carter HE; Gauntlett L; Amlôt R Health Secur; 2021; 19(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 33332230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Public response to the 2014 chemical spill in West Virginia: knowledge, opinions and behaviours. Savoia E; Stoto MA; Gupta R; Wright N; Viswanath K BMC Public Health; 2015 Aug; 15():790. PubMed ID: 26282554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Public perceptions of emergency decontamination: Effects of intervention type and responder management strategy during a focus group study. Carter H; Weston D; Betts N; Wilkinson S; Amlôt R PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195922. PubMed ID: 29652927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Facilitated Look-Back Analysis of Public Health Emergencies to Enhance Preparedness: A Brief Report of a Chemical Spill in Charleston, West Virginia. Piltch-Loeb R; Savoia E; Wright N; Gupta R; Stoto MA J Public Health Manag Pract; 2018; 24(6):E1-E5. PubMed ID: 29557853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing and improving cross-border chemical incident preparedness and response across Europe. Stewart-Evans J; Hall L; Czerczak S; Manley K; Dobney A; Hoffer S; Pałaszewska-Tkacz A; Jankowska A Environ Int; 2014 Nov; 72():30-6. PubMed ID: 24768281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19. Geldsetzer P J Med Internet Res; 2020 Apr; 22(4):e18790. PubMed ID: 32240094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Communicating Recommendations in Public Health Emergencies: The Role of Public Health Authorities. Holroyd TA; Oloko OK; Salmon DA; Omer SB; Limaye RJ Health Secur; 2020; 18(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 32078416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a risk-based prioritisation methodology to inform public health emergency planning and preparedness in case of accidental spill at sea of hazardous and noxious substances (HNS). Harold PD; de Souza AS; Louchart P; Russell D; Brunt H Environ Int; 2014 Nov; 72():157-63. PubMed ID: 24953645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How Do Low-Literacy Populations Perceive "Dirty Bombs"? Implications for Preparedness Messages. Bass SB; Gordon TF; Maurer L; Greener J; Mora G; Ruggieri D; Wolak C; Parvanta C Health Secur; 2016; 14(5):331-44. PubMed ID: 27584855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. UK resilience to a chemical incident. Clarke SA; Weir AGA BMJ Mil Health; 2020 Apr; 166(2):95-98. PubMed ID: 31154340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public Health System Research in Public Health Emergency Preparedness in the United States (2009-2015): Actionable Knowledge Base. Savoia E; Lin L; Bernard D; Klein N; James LP; Guicciardi S Am J Public Health; 2017 Sep; 107(S2):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 28892437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to communicate with the public about chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear terrorism: a systematic review of the literature. Rubin GJ; Chowdhury AK; Amlôt R Biosecur Bioterror; 2012 Dec; 10(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 23216210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of communication materials on public responses to a radiological dispersal device (RDD) attack. Rogers MB; Amlôt R; Rubin GJ Biosecur Bioterror; 2013 Mar; 11(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 23510306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effective responder communication improves efficiency and psychological outcomes in a mass decontamination field experiment: implications for public behaviour in the event of a chemical incident. Carter H; Drury J; Amlôt R; Rubin GJ; Williams R PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e89846. PubMed ID: 24595097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring communication, trust in government, and vaccination intention later in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic: results of a national survey. Quinn SC; Parmer J; Freimuth VS; Hilyard KM; Musa D; Kim KH Biosecur Bioterror; 2013 Jun; 11(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 23617721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]