BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23223864)

  • 1. Picoliter nDEP traps enable time-resolved contactless single bacterial cell analysis in controlled microenvironments.
    Fritzsch FS; Rosenthal K; Kampert A; Howitz S; Dusny C; Blank LM; Schmid A
    Lab Chip; 2013 Feb; 13(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 23223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Envirostat - a new bioreactor concept.
    Kortmann H; Chasanis P; Blank LM; Franzke J; Kenig EY; Schmid A
    Lab Chip; 2009 Feb; 9(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 19190793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A disposable picolitre bioreactor for cultivation and investigation of industrially relevant bacteria on the single cell level.
    Grünberger A; Paczia N; Probst C; Schendzielorz G; Eggeling L; Noack S; Wiechert W; Kohlheyer D
    Lab Chip; 2012 May; 12(11):2060-8. PubMed ID: 22511122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiscale variation-aware techniques for high-performance digital microfluidic lab-on-a-chip component placement.
    Liao C; Hu S
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2011 Mar; 10(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 21511570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insulator-based dielectrophoretic single particle and single cancer cell trapping.
    Bhattacharya S; Chao TC; Ros A
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Sep; 32(18):2550-8. PubMed ID: 21922497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond growth rate 0.6: Corynebacterium glutamicum cultivated in highly diluted environments.
    Grünberger A; van Ooyen J; Paczia N; Rohe P; Schiendzielorz G; Eggeling L; Wiechert W; Kohlheyer D; Noack S
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2013 Jan; 110(1):220-8. PubMed ID: 22890752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microtrap electrode devices for single cell trapping and impedance measurement.
    Mondal D; Roychaudhuri C; Das L; Chatterjee J
    Biomed Microdevices; 2012 Oct; 14(5):955-64. PubMed ID: 22767244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulation-based analysis of fluid flow and electrokinetic phenomena in microfluidic devices.
    Krishnamoorthy S; Bedekar AS; Feng J; Sundaram S
    Clin Lab Med; 2007 Mar; 27(1):41-59. PubMed ID: 17416301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Counting bacteria on a microfluidic chip.
    Song Y; Zhang H; Chon CH; Chen S; Pan X; Li D
    Anal Chim Acta; 2010 Nov; 681(1-2):82-6. PubMed ID: 21035606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of the geometry of negative dielectrophoresis traps for particle immobilization in digital microfluidic platforms.
    Nejad HR; Chowdhury OZ; Buat MD; Hoorfar M
    Lab Chip; 2013 May; 13(9):1823-30. PubMed ID: 23511544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metabolic viability of Escherichia coli trapped by dielectrophoresis in microfluidics.
    Donato SS; Chu V; Prazeres DM; Conde JP
    Electrophoresis; 2013 Feb; 34(4):575-82. PubMed ID: 23175163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated microfluidic chip for endothelial cells culture and analysis exposed to a pulsatile and oscillatory shear stress.
    Shao J; Wu L; Wu J; Zheng Y; Zhao H; Jin Q; Zhao J
    Lab Chip; 2009 Nov; 9(21):3118-25. PubMed ID: 19823728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A scalable microfluidic chip for bacterial suspension culture.
    Gan M; Su J; Wang J; Wu H; Chen L
    Lab Chip; 2011 Dec; 11(23):4087-92. PubMed ID: 22030862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Titanium-based dielectrophoresis devices for microfluidic applications.
    Zhang YT; Bottausci F; Rao MP; Parker ER; Mezic I; Macdonald NC
    Biomed Microdevices; 2008 Aug; 10(4):509-17. PubMed ID: 18214682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low cost and manufacturable complete microTAS for detecting bacteria.
    Sauer-Budge AF; Mirer P; Chatterjee A; Klapperich CM; Chargin D; Sharon A
    Lab Chip; 2009 Oct; 9(19):2803-10. PubMed ID: 19967117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of microelectrodes for electrochemiluminescent detection in microfluidic devices.
    Fredrick SJ; Gross EM
    Bioanalysis; 2009 Apr; 1(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 21083185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical and experimental evaluation of microfluidic sorting devices.
    Taylor JK; Ren CL; Stubley GD
    Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(4):981-91. PubMed ID: 19194907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distillation and detection of SO2 using a microfluidic chip.
    Ju WJ; Fu LM; Yang RJ; Lee CL
    Lab Chip; 2012 Feb; 12(3):622-6. PubMed ID: 22159042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasonic standing wave manipulation technology integrated into a dielectrophoretic chip.
    Wiklund M; Günther C; Lemor R; Jäger M; Fuhr G; Hertz HM
    Lab Chip; 2006 Dec; 6(12):1537-44. PubMed ID: 17203158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temperature measurements in microfluidic systems: heat dissipation of negative dielectrophoresis barriers.
    Seger-Sauli U; Panayiotou M; Schnydrig S; Jordan M; Renaud P
    Electrophoresis; 2005 Jun; 26(11):2239-46. PubMed ID: 15861466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.