These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23223925)

  • 1. [Application of new speech intelligibility tests in silence for the assessment of acquired hearing losses].
    Sukowski H; Wagener KC; Thiele C; Uppenkamp S; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2013 Jan; 61(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 23223925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of different speech intelligibility tests in German language (Freiburg speech test vs. Göttingen sentence test and monosyllabic rhyme test)].
    Sukowski H; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2009 Mar; 57(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 18696020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of the Göttingen sentence test and the monosyllabic rhyme test by von Wallenberg and Kollmeier with the Freiburg speech test : Investigation in a clinically representative group of listeners].
    Sukowski H; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2010 Jun; 58(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 20533016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Does modern speech audiometry belong in the assessment process?].
    Probst R
    HNO; 2013 Jan; 61(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 23223924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].
    Kollmeier B; Lenarz T; Winkler A; Zokoll MA; Sukowski H; Brand T; Wagener KC
    HNO; 2011 Oct; 59(10):1012-21. PubMed ID: 21769581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Hearing loss determination and assessment of the reduction in earning capacity taking speech discrimination tests in noise into account].
    Thiele C; Sukowski H; Wagener K; Kollmeier B; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    HNO; 2011 Nov; 59(11):1111-7. PubMed ID: 21959774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychometric functions for the CID W-22 and NU Auditory Test No. 6. Materials spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; Oyler AL
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):430-3. PubMed ID: 9360866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Correlation of pure tone thresholds and hearing loss for numbers. Comparison of three calculation variations for plausibility checking in expertise].
    Braun T; Dochtermann S; Krause E; Schmidt M; Schorn K; Hempel JM
    HNO; 2011 Sep; 59(9):908-14. PubMed ID: 21732149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Experiences with the distorted Freiburg Speech Test--diagnosis and rehabilitation of hearing disorders].
    Dieroff HG; Mangoldt W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jul; 68(7):372-8. PubMed ID: 2765049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of threshold, slope, and PB max for monosyllabic words.
    Beattie RC; Raffin MJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 3990262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SSW test performance-intensity functions for hearing-impaired adults.
    Flynn PA; Danhauer JL; Gerber SE; Goller MC; Arnst DJ
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(6):346-8. PubMed ID: 6510580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The Freiburg speech intelligibility test : A pillar of speech audiometry in German-speaking countries].
    Hoth S
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):540-8. PubMed ID: 27259640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.
    Studebaker GA; Sherbecoe RL; McDaniel DM; Gwaltney CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2431-44. PubMed ID: 10212424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic test in noise : Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test].
    Memmeler T; Schönweiler R; Wollenberg B; Löhler J
    HNO; 2019 Feb; 67(2):118-125. PubMed ID: 30519714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.
    Reinhart PN; Souza PE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.