334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23224141)
1. Intervention thresholds for denosumab in the UK using a FRAX®-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ström O; Jönsson B; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2013 Apr; 24(4):1491-502. PubMed ID: 23224141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of Denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Jönsson B; Ström O; Eisman JA; Papaioannou A; Siris ES; Tosteson A; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):967-82. PubMed ID: 20936401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost effectiveness of denosumab versus oral bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis in the US.
Parthan A; Kruse M; Yurgin N; Huang J; Viswanathan HN; Taylor D
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 11(5):485-97. PubMed ID: 23868102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cost-effectiveness of risedronate in the UK for the management of osteoporosis using the FRAX.
Borgström F; Ström O; Coelho J; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2010 Mar; 21(3):495-505. PubMed ID: 19565175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-Effectiveness of Intervention Thresholds for the Treatment of Osteoporosis Based on FRAX(®) in Portugal.
Marques A; Lourenço Ó; Ortsäter G; Borgström F; Kanis JA; da Silva JA
Calcif Tissue Int; 2016 Aug; 99(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 27016370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus oral alendronate for elderly osteoporotic women in Japan.
Mori T; Crandall CJ; Ganz DA
Osteoporos Int; 2017 May; 28(5):1733-1744. PubMed ID: 28210776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the UK for the management of osteoporosis.
Borgström F; Ström O; Coelho J; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2010 Feb; 21(2):339-49. PubMed ID: 19513577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of gastro-resistant risedronate tablets for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in France.
Hiligsmann M; Reginster JY
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Mar; 30(3):649-658. PubMed ID: 30701342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effective intervention thresholds against osteoporotic fractures based on FRAX® in Switzerland.
Lippuner K; Johansson H; Borgström F; Kanis JA; Rizzoli R
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Nov; 23(11):2579-89. PubMed ID: 22222755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Canada.
Chau D; Becker DL; Coombes ME; Ioannidis G; Adachi JD; Goeree R
J Med Econ; 2012; 15 Suppl 1():3-14. PubMed ID: 23035625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Denosumab: a cost-effective alternative for older men with osteoporosis from a Swedish payer perspective.
Parthan A; Kruse M; Agodoa I; Silverman S; Orwoll E
Bone; 2014 Feb; 59():105-13. PubMed ID: 24231131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Stevenson M; Jones ML; De Nigris E; Brewer N; Davis S; Oakley J
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jun; 9(22):1-160. PubMed ID: 15929857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of drugs for osteoporosis treatment in elderly Japanese women at high risk of fragility fractures: comparison of denosumab and weekly alendronate.
Yoshizawa T; Nishino T; Okubo I; Yamazaki M
Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Aug; 13(1):94. PubMed ID: 30159632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for the primary prevention of fragility fractures among adults aged 40 years and older in primary care: systematic reviews of the effects and acceptability of screening and treatment, and the accuracy of risk prediction tools.
Gates M; Pillay J; Nuspl M; Wingert A; Vandermeer B; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 12(1):51. PubMed ID: 36945065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Denosumab for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in post-menopausal women: a NICE single technology appraisal.
Scotland G; Waugh N; Royle P; McNamee P; Henderson R; Hollick R
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Nov; 29(11):951-61. PubMed ID: 21854080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost effectiveness of denosumab compared with oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporotic women in Belgium.
Hiligsmann M; Reginster JY
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Oct; 29(10):895-911. PubMed ID: 21692551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Greater first year effectiveness drives favorable cost-effectiveness of brand risedronate versus generic or brand alendronate: modeled Canadian analysis.
Grima DT; Papaioannou A; Thompson MF; Pasquale MK; Adachi JD
Osteoporos Int; 2008 May; 19(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 18008100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation on the cost-effective threshold of osteoporosis treatment on elderly women in China using discrete event simulation model.
Ni W; Jiang Y
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Feb; 28(2):529-538. PubMed ID: 27581955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women.
Hiligsmann M; Boonen A; Dirksen CD; Ben Sedrine W; Reginster JY
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2013 Feb; 13(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 23402442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of FRAX®-based intervention thresholds for management of osteoporosis in Singaporean women.
Chandran M; Ganesan G; Tan KB; Reginster JY; Hiligsmann M
Osteoporos Int; 2021 Jan; 32(1):133-144. PubMed ID: 32797250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
