These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23224377)

  • 21. Quantitative and Qualitative Coronary Plaque Assessment Using Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography: A Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound.
    Munnur RK; Andrews J; Kataoka Y; Nerlekar N; Psaltis PJ; Nicholls SJ; Malaiapan Y; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Seneviratne S; Wong DTL
    Heart Lung Circ; 2020 Jun; 29(6):883-893. PubMed ID: 31564511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
    Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Computed Tomography Attenuation and High-Risk Plaque Characteristics in Acute Coronary Syndrome Compared With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.
    Goeller M; Achenbach S; Cadet S; Kwan AC; Commandeur F; Slomka PJ; Gransar H; Albrecht MH; Tamarappoo BK; Berman DS; Marwan M; Dey D
    JAMA Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 3(9):858-863. PubMed ID: 30027285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inter- and intra-core laboratory variability in the quantitative coronary angiography analysis for drug-eluting stent treatment and follow up.
    Ito S; Kinoshita K; Endo A; Kami R; Kotake Y; Nakamura M
    Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis; 2020; 14():1753944720958982. PubMed ID: 32993464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Plaque progression assessed by a novel semi-automated quantitative plaque software on coronary computed tomography angiography between diabetes and non-diabetes patients: A propensity-score matching study.
    Nakanishi R; Ceponiene I; Osawa K; Luo Y; Kanisawa M; Megowan N; Nezarat N; Rahmani S; Broersen A; Kitslaar PH; Dailing C; Budoff MJ
    Atherosclerosis; 2016 Dec; 255():73-79. PubMed ID: 27835741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reproducibility of coronary atherosclerotic plaque characteristics in populations with low, intermediate, and high prevalence of coronary artery disease by multidetector computer tomography: a guide to reliable visual coronary plaque assessments.
    de Knegt MC; Linde JJ; Fuchs A; Nordestgaard BG; Køber LV; Hove JD; Kofoed KF
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1555-66. PubMed ID: 27378095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robust volume-targeted balanced steady-state free-precession coronary magnetic resonance angiography in a breathhold at 3.0 Tesla: a reproducibility study.
    Soleimanifard S; Stuber M; Hays AG; Weiss RG; Schär M
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Apr; 16(1):27. PubMed ID: 24758168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reproducibility of noncalcified coronary artery plaque burden quantification from coronary CT angiography across different image analysis platforms.
    Oberoi S; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ; Nance JW; De Cecco CN; Gebregziabher M; Costello P; Weininger M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):W43-9. PubMed ID: 24370164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Natural history of coronary atherosclerosis by multislice computed tomography.
    Papadopoulou SL; Neefjes LA; Garcia-Garcia HM; Flu WJ; Rossi A; Dharampal AS; Kitslaar PH; Mollet NR; Veldhof S; Nieman K; Stone GW; Serruys PW; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 5(3 Suppl):S28-37. PubMed ID: 22421228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automated Quantification of Coronary Plaque Volume From CT Angiography Improves CV Risk Prediction at Long-Term Follow-Up.
    Deseive S; Straub R; Kupke M; Nadjiri J; Broersen A; Kitslaar PH; Massberg S; Hadamitzky M; Hausleiter J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Feb; 11(2 Pt 1):280-282. PubMed ID: 28528151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparative analysis of deep learning-based location-adaptive threshold method software against other commercially available software.
    Park D; Park EA; Jeong B; Lee W
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Jun; 40(6):1269-1281. PubMed ID: 38634943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.
    Boogers MJ; Schuijf JD; Kitslaar PH; van Werkhoven JM; de Graaf FR; Boersma E; van Velzen JE; Dijkstra J; Adame IM; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Schreur JH; Heijenbrok MW; Jukema JW; Reiber JH; Bax JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul; 3(7):699-709. PubMed ID: 20633847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative assessment of stenosis severity and atherosclerotic plaque composition using 256-slice computed tomography.
    Korosoglou G; Mueller D; Lehrke S; Steen H; Hosch W; Heye T; Kauczor HU; Giannitsis E; Katus HA
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Aug; 20(8):1841-50. PubMed ID: 20306078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Deriving coronary artery calcium scores from CT coronary angiography: a proposed algorithm for evaluating stable chest pain.
    Pavitt CW; Harron K; Lindsay AC; Ray R; Zielke S; Gordon D; Rubens MB; Padley SP; Nicol ED
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Aug; 30(6):1135-43. PubMed ID: 24798126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction and normal invasive coronary angiography.
    Panayi G; Wieringa WG; Alfredsson J; Carlsson J; Karlsson JE; Persson A; Engvall J; Pundziute G; Swahn E
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 May; 16():78. PubMed ID: 27142217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of the ratio of coronary arterial lumen volume to left ventricle myocardial mass derived from coronary CT angiography on fractional flow reserve.
    Taylor CA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Achenbach S; Berman DS; Jensen JM; Dey D; Bøtker HE; Kim HJ; Khem S; Wilk A; Zarins CK; Bezerra H; Lesser J; Ko B; Narula J; Ahmadi A; Øvrehus KA; St Goar F; De Bruyne B; Nørgaard BL
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017 Nov; 11(6):429-436. PubMed ID: 28789941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accurate quantification of vessel cross-sectional area using CT angiography: a simulation study.
    Molloi S; Johnson T; Ding H; Lipinski J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Mar; 33(3):411-419. PubMed ID: 27838897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of coronary plaque progression in coronary computed tomography angiography using a semiquantitative score.
    Lehman SJ; Schlett CL; Bamberg F; Lee H; Donnelly P; Shturman L; Kriegel MF; Brady TJ; Hoffmann U
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1262-70. PubMed ID: 19909929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consistency of quantitative analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Lee SE; Park HB; Xuan D; Lee BK; Hong MK; Jang Y; Chang HJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 30342980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproducibility of intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis: implications for the design of longitudinal studies.
    Rodriguez-Granillo GA; Vaina S; García-García HM; Valgimigli M; Duckers E; van Geuns RJ; Regar E; van der Giessen WJ; Bressers M; Goedhart D; Morel MA; de Feyter PJ; Serruys PW
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2006 Oct; 22(5):621-31. PubMed ID: 16575482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.