These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23225115)
1. Number of target lesions for EASL and modified RECIST to predict survivals in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with chemoembolization. Kim BK; Kim SU; Kim MJ; Kim KA; Kim DY; Park JY; Ahn SH; Han KH; Chon CY Clin Cancer Res; 2013 Mar; 19(6):1503-11. PubMed ID: 23225115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which response criteria best help predict survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following chemoembolization? A validation study of old and new models. Shim JH; Lee HC; Kim SO; Shin YM; Kim KM; Lim YS; Suh DJ Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):708-18. PubMed ID: 22187634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective comparison of prognostic values of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours with European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria in hepatocellular carcinoma following chemoembolisation. Kim BK; Kim KA; Park JY; Ahn SH; Chon CY; Han KH; Kim SU; Kim MJ Eur J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 49(4):826-34. PubMed ID: 22995582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria are superior to European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria at 1 month follow-up for predicting long-term survival in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer. Shuster A; Huynh TJ; Rajan DK; Marquez MA; Grant DR; Huynh DC; Jaskolka JD J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):805-12. PubMed ID: 23562641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EASL- and mRECIST-evaluated responses to combination therapy of sorafenib with transarterial chemoembolization predict survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liu L; Wang W; Chen H; Zhao Y; Bai W; Yin Z; He C; Jia J; Yang M; Xia J; Fan D; Han G Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Mar; 20(6):1623-31. PubMed ID: 24493832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal measurement modality and method for evaluation of responses to transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma based on enhancement criteria. Shim JH; Han S; Shin YM; Yu E; Park W; Kim KM; Lim YS; Lee HC J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 23312990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EASL and mRECIST responses are independent prognostic factors for survival in hepatocellular cancer patients treated with transarterial embolization. Gillmore R; Stuart S; Kirkwood A; Hameeduddin A; Woodward N; Burroughs AK; Meyer T J Hepatol; 2011 Dec; 55(6):1309-16. PubMed ID: 21703196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maximum number of target lesions required to measure responses to transarterial chemoembolization using the enhancement criteria in patients with intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Shim JH; Lee HC; Won HJ; Shin YM; Kim KM; Lim YS; Suh DJ J Hepatol; 2012 Feb; 56(2):406-11. PubMed ID: 21782761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. mRECIST and EASL responses at early time point by contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI predict survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by doxorubicin drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB TACE). Prajapati HJ; Spivey JR; Hanish SI; El-Rayes BF; Kauh JS; Chen Z; Kim HS Ann Oncol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):965-73. PubMed ID: 23223331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the methods for tumor response assessment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization. Jung ES; Kim JH; Yoon EL; Lee HJ; Lee SJ; Suh SJ; Lee BJ; Seo YS; Yim HJ; Seo TS; Lee CH; Yeon JE; Park JJ; Kim JS; Bak YT; Byun KS J Hepatol; 2013 Jun; 58(6):1181-7. PubMed ID: 23395691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EASL and mRECIST responses are independent predictors of survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with cryoablation. Li H; Guo Z; Si T; Wang H Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 May; 25(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 23325276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imaging response in the primary index lesion and clinical outcomes following transarterial locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Riaz A; Miller FH; Kulik LM; Nikolaidis P; Yaghmai V; Lewandowski RJ; Mulcahy MF; Ryu RK; Sato KT; Gupta R; Wang E; Baker T; Abecassis M; Benson AB; Nemcek AA; Omary R; Salem R JAMA; 2010 Mar; 303(11):1062-9. PubMed ID: 20233824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: MR imaging after intraarterial therapy. Part II. Response stratification using volumetric functional criteria after intraarterial therapy. Bonekamp S; Halappa VG; Geschwind JF; Li Z; Corona-Villalobos CP; Reyes D; Bhagat N; Cosgrove DP; Pawlik TM; Mezey E; Eng J; Kamel IR Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):431-9. PubMed ID: 23616632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of RECIST and mRECIST criteria as prognostic factors in patients undergoing repeated iodized oil chemoembolization of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Hyun D; Shin SW; Cho SK; Park KB; Park HS; Choo SW; Do YS; Choo IW; Shin JW; Lim SJ Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1437-45. PubMed ID: 25480473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic Relevance of Objective Response According to EASL Criteria and mRECIST Criteria in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Loco-Regional Therapies: A Literature-Based Meta-Analysis. Vincenzi B; Di Maio M; Silletta M; D'Onofrio L; Spoto C; Piccirillo MC; Daniele G; Comito F; Maci E; Bronte G; Russo A; Santini D; Perrone F; Tonini G PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133488. PubMed ID: 26230853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of tumor response on computed tomography with pathological necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma treated by chemoembolization before liver transplantation. Dioguardi Burgio M; Ronot M; Bruno O; Francoz C; Paradis V; Castera L; Durand F; Soubrane O; Vilgrain V Liver Transpl; 2016 Nov; 22(11):1491-1500. PubMed ID: 27543821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors and European Association for The Study of the Liver criteria using delayed-phase imaging at an early time point predict survival in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following yttrium-90 radioembolization. Camacho JC; Kokabi N; Xing M; Prajapati HJ; El-Rayes B; Kim HS J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):256-65. PubMed ID: 24461131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors is superior to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors for assessment of responses to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Takada J; Hidaka H; Nakazawa T; Kondo M; Numata K; Tanaka K; Matsunaga K; Okuse C; Kobayashi S; Morimoto M; Ohkawa S; Koizumi W BMC Res Notes; 2015 Oct; 8():609. PubMed ID: 26502722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter-observer variability of response evaluation criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with chemoembolization. Kim BK; Kim KA; Kim MJ; Park JY; Kim DY; Ahn SH; Han KH; Kim SU; Park MS Dig Liver Dis; 2015 Aug; 47(8):682-8. PubMed ID: 25977216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The true role of mRECIST guideline: does it really estimate viable tumor or merely improve accuracy in hepatocellular carcinoma response evaluation? Liu Q; Li A; Sun S; Luo R; Chen F J BUON; 2014; 19(2):398-405. PubMed ID: 24965398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]