These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23225301)

  • 1. Bone mineral density assessment by dual energy X-ray absorbtiometry as multiple or single assessment of rat bones causes discrepancy.
    Koc ZP; Balci TA; Say Y; Aksakal B; Güler A
    Arch Osteoporos; 2012; 7():319-20. PubMed ID: 23225301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Canadian Association of Radiologists Technical Standards for Bone Mineral Densitometry Reporting.
    Siminoski K; O'Keeffe M; Brown JP; Burrell S; Coupland D; Dumont M; Ganguli SN; Hanley DA; Law-Dillabough A; Lévesque J;
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2013 Nov; 64(4):281-94. PubMed ID: 24314581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suspension criteria for dual energy X ray absorptiometry.
    McLean ID
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):227-9. PubMed ID: 23169815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pixi bone density and screening of osteoporosis.
    Pérez-Castrillon JL
    Maturitas; 2006 Sep; 55(2):200. PubMed ID: 16842942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in diagnosis of osteoporosis: basic principles, indications, and scan interpretation.
    Theodorou DJ; Theodorou SJ; Sartoris DJ
    Compr Ther; 2002; 28(3):190-200. PubMed ID: 12360631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic and therapeutic technology assessment. Measurement of bone density with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
    JAMA; 1992 Jan; 267(2):286-8, 290-4. PubMed ID: 1727530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions.
    Hans DB; Shepherd JA; Schwartz EN; Reid DM; Blake GM; Fordham JN; Fuerst T; Hadji P; Itabashi A; Krieg MA; Lewiecki EM
    J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(1):188-206. PubMed ID: 18442759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Degeneration of the lumbar spine and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in patients without osteoporosis.
    Atalay A; Kozakcioglu M; Cubuk R; Tasali N; Guney S
    Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 19712818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Possible methods for evaluating bone density in the maxillofacial region].
    Koppány F; Joób-Fancsaly A; Szabo G
    Fogorv Sz; 2007 Apr; 100(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 17546899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: value in orthopedics].
    Maugars Y; Berthelot JM; Delécrin J; Trécant M; Passuti N; Daculsi G; Prost A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995; 81(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 8560002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft tissue density variations in thalassemia major: a possible pitfall in lumbar bone mineral density measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Yildiz M; Canatan D
    Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 22(8):723-6. PubMed ID: 16251180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
    Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A quantitative analysis of rat osteoporosis model with a microfocus X-ray tube and digital radiography system.
    Nakagawa K; Igaki H; Aoki Y; Ohtomo K; Kawaguchi H; Eto M
    Radiat Med; 1999; 17(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 10399786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pediatric DXA bone measurements.
    Sanchez MM; Gilsanz V
    Pediatr Endocrinol Rev; 2005 Feb; 2 Suppl 3():337-41. PubMed ID: 16456502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis of osteoporosis: a practical guide.
    Lorente-Ramos R; Azpeitia-Armán J; Muñoz-Hernández A; García-Gómez JM; Díez-Martínez P; Grande-Bárez M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Apr; 196(4):897-904. PubMed ID: 21427343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone densitometry and bone biopsy.
    Ralston SH
    Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Jun; 19(3):487-501. PubMed ID: 15939371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss.
    Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Winzenberg T; Jones G
    Aust Fam Physician; 2011; 40(1-2):43-4. PubMed ID: 21301693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: acquisition of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition and considerations regarding analysis and repeatability of measures.
    Hangartner TN; Warner S; Braillon P; Jankowski L; Shepherd J
    J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(4):520-36. PubMed ID: 24183641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inaccuracies inherent in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo bone mineral density can seriously mislead diagnostic/prognostic interpretations of patient-specific bone fragility.
    Bolotin HH; Sievänen H
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 May; 16(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 11341324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.