143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23225419)
21. Regardless of skill, performing more biopsies increases the sensitivity of colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Hu S; Zhang X; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Jul; 15(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 21436729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Colposcopy in the diagnosis of early cervical cancer].
Kühn W
Pathologe; 2011 Nov; 32(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 21984389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Do colposcopically directed biopsy and endocervical curettage serve to induce regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Diedrich JT; Felix JC; Lonky NM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2014 Oct; 18(4):322-5. PubMed ID: 25171104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance of colposcopy in five sub-Saharan African countries.
Muwonge R; Mbalawa CG; Keita N; Dolo A; Nouhou H; Nacoulma M; Malanda JN; Koulibaly M; Bayo S; Sankaranarayanan R;
BJOG; 2009 May; 116(6):829-37. PubMed ID: 19432573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using electrical impedance spectroscopy with colposcopy.
Tidy JA; Brown BH; Healey TJ; Daayana S; Martin M; Prendiville W; Kitchener HC
BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):400-10; discussion 410-1. PubMed ID: 23289897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validity of colposcopy in the diagnosis of early cervical neoplasia--a review.
Olaniyan OB
Afr J Reprod Health; 2002 Dec; 6(3):59-69. PubMed ID: 12685410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of colposcopy in the diagnosis of histologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN2+).
Dorji N; Tshering S; Choden S; Chhetri M; Bhujel D; Wangden T; Pradhan B; Bhutia PC; Tshomo U
BMC Cancer; 2022 Aug; 22(1):930. PubMed ID: 36038826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Key Determinants of the Value of Random Cervical Biopsy at Colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Wu R; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Oct; 23(4):241-247. PubMed ID: 31592970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. New technologies and advances in colposcopic assessment.
Tan JH; Wrede CD
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Oct; 25(5):667-77. PubMed ID: 21664876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Observer agreement on interpreting colposcopic images of CIN.
Hopman EH; Voorhorst FJ; Kenemans P; Meyer CJ; Helmerhorst TJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 58(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 7622107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance of the abbreviated Reid colposcopic index in prediction of high-grade lesions.
Boonlikit S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 134(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 27085982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. False negative colposcopy is associated with thinner cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3.
Yang B; Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang X; Burchette R; Qiao YL
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 18485462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of colposcopy in the diagnostic setting compared with the screening setting.
Cantor SB; Cárdenas-Turanzas M; Cox DD; Atkinson EN; Nogueras-Gonzalez GM; Beck JR; Follen M; Benedet JL
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18165387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microcolposcopy vs colposcopy in evaluating abnormal Pap smear. Comparison with histological findings.
Framarino dei Malatesta ML; Carraro C; Silvestrini I; Marzetti L; Vecchione A
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1993; 20(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 8281705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of the accuracy of colposcopy in detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and cervical cancer.
Ruan Y; Liu M; Guo J; Zhao J; Niu S; Li F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1529-1538. PubMed ID: 32808113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical biopsy sampling variability in ALTS.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Apr; 15(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 21169866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Polarized Light Colposcopy Compared With Standard Colposcopy.
Ferris DG; Condorhuaman WS; Waller JL; Allmond L; Goebel A
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Jul; 19(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 25943867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of guidelines for observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in young women.
Dempster-Rivett K; Innes CR; Simcock BJ; Harker D; Williman JA; Van Der Griend RA; Whitehead M; Hibma M; Lawton BA; Fitzgerald P; Dudley NM; Petrich S; Faherty J; Bergzoll C; Eva L; Sadler L; Pather S; Wrede CD; Sykes PH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 223(3):408.e1-408.e11. PubMed ID: 32109465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Classification of cervical neoplasms on colposcopic photography using deep learning.
Cho BJ; Choi YJ; Lee MJ; Kim JH; Son GH; Park SH; Kim HB; Joo YJ; Cho HY; Kyung MS; Park YH; Kang BS; Hur SY; Lee S; Park ST
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13652. PubMed ID: 32788635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
