BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

607 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23225502)

  • 1. Relationship between patient pre-treatment object relations functioning and psychodynamic techniques early in treatment.
    Mullin AS; Hilsenroth MJ
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2014; 21(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 23225502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in Object Relations over the Course of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy.
    Mullin AS; Hilsenroth MJ; Gold J; Farber BA
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2017 Mar; 24(2):501-511. PubMed ID: 27238157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring in-session focus on the patient-therapist relationship: patient characteristics, process and outcome.
    Kuutmann K; Hilsenroth MJ
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2012; 19(3):187-202. PubMed ID: 21370317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Object representation quality, therapeutic alliance, and psychotherapy process.
    Sanders A; Hilsenroth M; Fowler JC
    Bull Menninger Clin; 2014; 78(3):197-227. PubMed ID: 25247741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What interpersonal problems are related to different therapeutic techniques early in treatment?
    McMillen K; Hilsenroth MJ
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2019 Jul; 26(4):502-509. PubMed ID: 31018254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facets of Object Representation: Process and Outcome Over the Course of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy.
    Mullin ASJ; Hilsenroth MJ; Gold J; Farber BA
    J Pers Assess; 2018; 100(2):145-155. PubMed ID: 27606942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaction among alliance, psychodynamic-interpersonal and cognitive-behavioural techniques in the prediction of post-session change.
    Owen J; Hilsenroth MJ; Rodolfa E
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2013; 20(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 22528040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between interpretation, alliance, and outcome in psychodynamic psychotherapy: control of therapist effects and assessment of moderator variable impact.
    Levy SR; Hilsenroth MJ; Owen JJ
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2015 Jun; 203(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 25988432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction between alliance and technique in predicting patient outcome during psychodynamic psychotherapy.
    Owen J; Hilsenroth MJ
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2011 Jun; 199(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 21629016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The combined predictive effect of patient characteristics and alliance on long-term dynamic and interpersonal functioning after dynamic psychotherapy.
    Hersoug AG; Høglend P; Gabbard GO; Lorentzen S
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2013; 20(4):297-307. PubMed ID: 22298434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychodynamic techniques related to outcome for anxiety disorder patients at different points in treatment.
    Pitman S; Slavin-Mulford J; Hilsenroth M
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2014 May; 202(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 24727725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale (SCORS) and attachment style in a clinical sample.
    Stein MB; Siefert CJ; Stewart RV; Hilsenroth MJ
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2011; 18(6):512-23. PubMed ID: 20806423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of object relations versus interpersonal functioning as predictors of therapeutic alliance and psychotherapy outcome.
    Piper WE; Azim HF; Joyce AS; McCallum M; Nixon GW; Segal PS
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1991 Jul; 179(7):432-8. PubMed ID: 1869873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between patient object relations and the therapeutic alliance in a naturalistic psychotherapy sample.
    Errázuriz P; Constantino MJ; Calvo E
    Psychol Psychother; 2015 Sep; 88(3):254-69. PubMed ID: 25409621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient ratings of psychodynamic psychotherapy session activities and their relation to outcome.
    DeFife JA; Hilsenroth MJ; Gold JR
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2008 Jul; 196(7):538-47. PubMed ID: 18626294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Therapeutic alliance in the personal therapy of graduate clinicians: relationship to the alliance and outcomes of their patients.
    Gold SH; Hilsenroth MJ; Kuutmann K; Owen JJ
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2015; 22(4):304-16. PubMed ID: 24549582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attachment style changes following intensive short-term group psychotherapy.
    Kinley JL; Reyno SM
    Int J Group Psychother; 2013 Jan; 63(1):53-75. PubMed ID: 23252815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Process and technique factors associated with patient ratings of session safety during psychodynamic psychotherapy.
    Siegel DF; Hilsenroth MJ
    Am J Psychother; 2013; 67(3):257-76. PubMed ID: 24236355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining the relationship between object relations and interpersonal distress in a clinical sample.
    Cain L; Hilsenroth M
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2020 Sep; 27(5):760-769. PubMed ID: 32307814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychodynamic group psychotherapy: impact of group length and therapist professional characteristics on development of therapeutic alliance.
    Lorentzen S; Bakali JV; Hersoug AG; Hagtvet KA; Ruud T; Høglend P
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2012 Sep; 19(5):420-33. PubMed ID: 21626613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.