These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23225802)

  • 1. Effects of post biopsy digital rectal compression on improving prostate cancer staging using magnetic resonance imaging in localized prostate cancer.
    Park KK; Chung MS; Chung SY; Kim JH; Chung BH
    Yonsei Med J; 2013 Jan; 54(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 23225802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anterior apical cores in the initial prostate biopsy does not increase detection of significant prostate cancer.
    Ekin RG; Zorlu F; Akarken I; Yildirim Z; Tarhan H; Koc G; Kucuk U; Bayol U
    Urol J; 2015 Apr; 12(2):2084-9. PubMed ID: 25923153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer.
    Mullerad M; Hricak H; Kuroiwa K; Pucar D; Chen HN; Kattan MW; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2158-63. PubMed ID: 16280755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
    Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
    Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Thompson JE; van Leeuwen PJ; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
    J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1428-1435. PubMed ID: 26529298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Value of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Improving the Detection of Anterior Prostate Cancer.
    Zugor V; Kühn R; Engelhard K; Poth S; Bernat MM; Porres D; Labanaris AP
    Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4279-83. PubMed ID: 27466544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in men with previously negative prostate biopsy results.
    Lee SH; Chung MS; Kim JH; Oh YT; Rha KH; Chung BH
    J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):787-91. PubMed ID: 22122555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Negative Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Risk of Significant Prostate Cancer: Baseline and Long-Term Followup Results.
    Buisset J; Norris JM; Puech P; Leroy X; Ramdane N; Drumez E; Villers A; Olivier J
    J Urol; 2021 Mar; 205(3):725-731. PubMed ID: 33080153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
    Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
    Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The predictability of T3 disease in staging MRI following prostate biopsy decreases in patients with high initial PSA and Gleason score.
    Hwii Ko Y; Jae Sung D; Gu Kang S; Ho Kang S; Gu Lee J; Jong Kim J; Cheon J
    Asian J Androl; 2011 May; 13(3):487-93. PubMed ID: 21383671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prebiopsy multiparametric 3T prostate MRI in patients with elevated PSA, normal digital rectal examination, and no previous biopsy.
    Jambor I; Kähkönen E; Taimen P; Merisaari H; Saunavaara J; Alanen K; Obsitnik B; Minn H; Lehotska V; Aronen HJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 41(5):1394-404. PubMed ID: 24956412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
    Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
    Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Digital Rectal Examination and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of 6,630 Men.
    Catalona WJ; Richie JP; Ahmann FR; Hudson MA; Scardino PT; Flanigan RC; DeKernion JB; Ratliff TL; Kavoussi LR; Dalkin BL; Waters WB; MacFarlane MT; Southwick PC
    J Urol; 2017 Feb; 197(2S):S200-S207. PubMed ID: 28012755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preoperative prediction of neurovascular bundle involvement of localized prostate cancer by combined T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging of magnetic resonance imaging, number of positive biopsy cores, and Gleason score.
    Naiki T; Okamura T; Nagata D; Mori Y; Kawai N; Ogawa K; Akita H; Hashimoto Y; Tozawa K; Kohri K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 21790224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preoperative prediction of pathological tumor volume and stage in clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    McSherry SA; Levy F; Schiebler ML; Keefe B; Dent GA; Mohler JL
    J Urol; 1991 Jul; 146(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 1711590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The feasibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for targeted biopsy using novel navigation systems to detect early stage prostate cancer: the preliminary experience.
    Mouraviev V; Verma S; Kalyanaraman B; Zhai QJ; Gaitonde K; Pugnale M; Donovan JF
    J Endourol; 2013 Jul; 27(7):820-5. PubMed ID: 22966987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An update on prostate biopsy in the era of magnetic resonance imaging.
    Cicione A; De Nunzio C; Manno S; Damiano R; Posti A; Lima E; Tubaro A; Balloni F
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2018 Jun; 70(3):264-274. PubMed ID: 29595039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visually Estimated MRI Targeted Prostate Biopsy Could Improve the Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with a PSA Level <10 ng/mL.
    Lee DH; Nam JK; Park SW; Lee SS; Han JY; Lee SD; Lee JW; Chung MK
    Yonsei Med J; 2016 May; 57(3):565-71. PubMed ID: 26996553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.