187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23225808)
1. Correlations of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with morphologic, angiogenic, and molecular prognostic factors in rectal cancer.
Hong HS; Kim SH; Park HJ; Park MS; Kim KW; Kim WH; Kim NK; Lee JM; Cho HJ
Yonsei Med J; 2013 Jan; 54(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 23225808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters with angiogenesis and biologic aggressiveness of rectal cancer: Preliminary results.
Yeo DM; Oh SN; Jung CK; Lee MA; Oh ST; Rha SE; Jung SE; Byun JY; Gall P; Son Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Feb; 41(2):474-80. PubMed ID: 24375840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perfusion parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rectal cancer: correlation with microvascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor expression.
Kim YE; Lim JS; Choi J; Kim D; Myoung S; Kim MJ; Kim KW
Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(6):878-85. PubMed ID: 24265562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative parameters in DCE-MRI with a blood pool agent in rectal cancer: can semiquantitative parameters be used as a surrogate for quantitative parameters?
Dijkhoff RAP; Maas M; Martens MH; Papanikolaou N; Lambregts DMJ; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RGH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1342-1349. PubMed ID: 28050622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic MRI in indirect estimation of microvessel density, histologic grade, and prognosis in colorectal adenocarcinomas.
Tuncbilek N; Karakas HM; Altaner S
Abdom Imaging; 2004; 29(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 15290941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rectal cancer: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI correlates with lymph node status and epidermal growth factor receptor expression.
Lollert A; Junginger T; Schimanski CC; Biesterfeld S; Gockel I; Düber C; Oberholzer K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1436-42. PubMed ID: 24127411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in Rectal Cancer.
Sun H; Xu Y; Xu Q; Duan J; Zhang H; Liu T; Li L; Chan Q; Xie S; Wang W
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):e134-e140. PubMed ID: 30268719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and correlation with tumor angiogenesis in bladder cancer.
Tuncbilek N; Kaplan M; Altaner S; Atakan IH; Süt N; Inci O; Demir MK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):949-55. PubMed ID: 19304699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perfusion-sensitive parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion MRI in rectal cancer: evaluation of reproducibility and correlation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Yang X; Xiao X; Lu B; Chen Y; Wen Z; Yu S
Acta Radiol; 2019 May; 60(5):569-577. PubMed ID: 30114928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rectal cancer: 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; correlation with microvascular density and clinicopathological features.
Yao WW; Zhang H; Ding B; Fu T; Jia H; Pang L; Song L; Xu W; Song Q; Chen K; Pan Z
Radiol Med; 2011 Apr; 116(3):366-74. PubMed ID: 21298356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of rectal carcinoma at 3T: correlation with microvascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor markers of tumor angiogenesis.
Zhang XM; Yu D; Zhang HL; Dai Y; Bi D; Liu Z; Prince MR; Li C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):1309-16. PubMed ID: 18504761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of DCE-MRI for staging and response evaluation in rectal cancer: A systematic review.
Dijkhoff RAP; Beets-Tan RGH; Lambregts DMJ; Beets GL; Maas M
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():155-168. PubMed ID: 28987662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma using gadoxetic acid: correlations with Ki67 proliferation status, histological grades, and microvascular density.
Chen J; Chen C; Xia C; Huang Z; Zuo P; Stemmer A; Song B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jun; 43(6):1393-1403. PubMed ID: 28939963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preliminary experience using dynamic MRI at 3.0 Tesla for evaluation of soft tissue tumors.
Park MY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Lee SY; Jung JY
Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 23323039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of dynamic perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in patients with local advanced rectal cancer.
Ippolito D; Drago SG; Pecorelli A; Maino C; Querques G; Mariani I; Franzesi CT; Sironi S
World J Gastroenterol; 2020 May; 26(20):2657-2668. PubMed ID: 32523318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can imaging kinetic parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging be valuable in predicting clinicopathological prognostic factors of invasive breast cancer?
Wang C; Wei W; Santiago L; Whitman G; Dogan B
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jul; 59(7):813-821. PubMed ID: 29105486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlations of 3T DCE-MRI quantitative parameters with microvessel density in a human-colorectal-cancer xenograft mouse model.
Ahn SJ; An CS; Koom WS; Song HT; Suh JS
Korean J Radiol; 2011; 12(6):722-30. PubMed ID: 22043155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic aspects of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in synchronous distant metastatic rectal cancer.
Yu J; Xu Q; Huang DY; Song JC; Li Y; Xu LL; Shi HB
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1840-1847. PubMed ID: 27595835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging and multiecho dynamic contrast-based MRI in rectal cancer.
Bakke KM; Grøvik E; Meltzer S; Negård A; Holmedal SH; Mikalsen LTG; Lyckander LG; Ree AH; Gjesdal KI; Redalen KR; Bjørnerud A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 50(4):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 30945379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between perfusion computed tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer.
Kierkels RG; Backes WH; Janssen MH; Buijsen J; Beets-Tan RG; Lambin P; Lammering G; Oellers MC; Aerts HJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jun; 77(2):400-8. PubMed ID: 19733445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]