BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23226779)

  • 1. Number of metastasis-positive lymph node stations is a simple and reliable prognostic factor following surgery in patients with esophageal cancer.
    Takeno S; Yamashita SI; Yamamoto S; Takahashi Y; Moroga T; Kawahara K; Shiroshita T; Yamana I; Maki K; Yamashita Y
    Exp Ther Med; 2012 Dec; 4(6):1087-1091. PubMed ID: 23226779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Impact of number and extent of lymph node metastasis on prognosis of thoracic esophageal cancer].
    FENG J; MAO T; CHEN WH; FANG WT
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 14(9):715-8. PubMed ID: 21948541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes on the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of NSCLC.
    Katsumata S; Aokage K; Ishii G; Nakasone S; Sakai T; Okada S; Miyoshi T; Tane K; Tsuboi M
    J Thorac Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(8):1408-1418. PubMed ID: 31055075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between lymph node station- and zone-based classification for the future revision of node descriptors proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer in surgically resected patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Yun JK; Lee GD; Choi S; Kim HR; Kim YH; Kim DK; Park SI
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Nov; 56(5):849-857. PubMed ID: 31168596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma.
    Katai H; Yoshimura K; Maruyama K; Sasako M; Sano T
    Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1796-800. PubMed ID: 10760754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can extracapsular lymph node involvement be a tool to fine-tune pN1 for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction in the Union Internationale contre le Cancer (UICC) TNM 7th edition?†.
    Nafteux P; Lerut T; De Hertogh G; Moons J; Coosemans W; Decker G; Van Veer H; De Leyn P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Jun; 45(6):1001-10. PubMed ID: 24477743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the nodal status in the 7th edition of the UICC-TNM classification for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: proposed modifications for improved survival stratification : impact of lymph node metastases on overall survival after esophagectomy.
    Yamasaki M; Miyata H; Miyazaki Y; Takahashi T; Kurokawa Y; Nakajima K; Takiguchi S; Mori M; Doki Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):2850-6. PubMed ID: 24728822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. International Multicenter Study on the Impact of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement in Primary Surgery Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus on Overall Survival and Staging Systems.
    Nafteux PR; Lerut AM; Moons J; Hölscher AH; Bollschweiler E; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Lagarde SM; van Lanschot JJ; Messager M; Mariette C; D'Journo XB; Thomas PA; De Leyn PR
    Ann Surg; 2015 Nov; 262(5):809-15; discussion 815-6. PubMed ID: 26583670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.
    Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N
    Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative effect of lymph node metastasis classified by the anatomical site or by the number of nodes involved on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.
    Hidaka H; Eto T; Maehara N; Jimi S; Hotokezaka M; Chijiiwa K
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(88):2269-72. PubMed ID: 19260520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardize the surgical technique and clarify the oncologic significance of robotic D3-D4 lymphadenectomy for upper rectum and sigmoid colon cancer with clinically more than N2 lymph node metastasis.
    Chen TC; Liao YT; Huang J; Hung JS; Liang JT
    Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):2034-2043. PubMed ID: 38668657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of the Currently Used Nodal Stage Classification with the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and the Number of Metastatic Lymph Node Stations for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Which of These Is the Best Prognostic Factor?
    Citak N; Aksoy Y; Isgörücü Ö; Obuz C; Acikmese B; Buyukkale S; Metin M; Sayar A
    Zentralbl Chir; 2020 Dec; 145(6):565-573. PubMed ID: 31648357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification.
    Ichikura T; Tomimatsu S; Uefuji K; Kimura M; Uchida T; Morita D; Mochizuki H
    Cancer; 1999 Aug; 86(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 10440681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Prognostic Significance of Mode of Nodal Involvement in Pulmonary pN1 Squamous Cell Carcinoma].
    Yasukawa M; Kawaguchi T; Kawai N; Tojo T; Taniguchi S
    Kyobu Geka; 2018 Mar; 71(3):163-168. PubMed ID: 29755067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance of the number of positive lymph nodes in resected non-small cell lung cancer.
    Fukui T; Mori S; Yokoi K; Mitsudomi T
    J Thorac Oncol; 2006 Feb; 1(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 17409840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer.
    Yoo CH; Noh SH; Kim YI; Min JS
    World J Surg; 1999 May; 23(5):492-7; discussion 497-8. PubMed ID: 10085399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new classification of lymph node metastases according to the lymph node stations for predicting prognosis in surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Lin Z; Chen W; Chen Y; Peng X; Zhu K; Lin Y; Lin Q; Hu Z
    Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(46):76261-76273. PubMed ID: 27788489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems.
    Ikeguchi M; Murakami D; Kanaji S; Ohro S; Maeta Y; Yamaguchi K; Tatebe S; Kondo A; Tsujitani S; Kaibara N
    ANZ J Surg; 2004 Oct; 74(10):852-4. PubMed ID: 15456431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic significance of surgical-pathologic N1 lymph node involvement in non-small cell lung cancer.
    Demir A; Turna A; Kocaturk C; Gunluoglu MZ; Aydogmus U; Urer N; Bedirhan MA; Gurses A; Dincer SI
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Apr; 87(4):1014-22. PubMed ID: 19324121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic significance of regional lymph node metastasis according to station in ampullary carcinoma.
    Tashiro K; Kuroki N; Einama T; Iwasaki T; Miyata Y; Aosasa S; Inoue Y; Takahashi Y; Ogata S; Ueno H; Hase K; Yamamoto J; Kishi Y
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2020 Oct; 27(10):712-720. PubMed ID: 32578342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.