189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23227134)
1. A comparison of usability factors of four mobile devices for accessing healthcare information by adolescents.
Sheehan B; Lee Y; Rodriguez M; Tiase V; Schnall R
Appl Clin Inform; 2012; 3(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 23227134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electronic health record on the go: Device form factor and Fitts' law.
Drews FA; Zadra JR; Gleed J
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Mar; 111():37-44. PubMed ID: 29425632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding the barriers to successful adoption and use of a mobile health information system in a community health center in São Paulo, Brazil: a cohort study.
Rajan JV; Moura J; Gourley G; Kiso K; Sizilio A; Cortez AM; Riley LW; Veras MA; Sarkar U
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Nov; 16(1):146. PubMed ID: 27855685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying usability: an evaluation of a diabetes mHealth system on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction metrics with associated user characteristics.
Georgsson M; Staggers N
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Jan; 23(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 26377990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A methodological framework for evaluating mobile health devices.
Kaufman DR; Starren JB
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():978. PubMed ID: 17238597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Mobile Health Technology Use for Self-Tracking Between Older Adults and the General Adult Population in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey.
Jaana M; Paré G
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Nov; 8(11):e24718. PubMed ID: 33104517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Mobile Health Technologies for Facilitating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Scoping Review.
Lee AM; Chavez S; Bian J; Thompson LA; Gurka MJ; Williamson VG; Modave F
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e11847. PubMed ID: 30747716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aging barriers influencing mobile health usability for older adults: A literature based framework (MOLD-US).
Wildenbos GA; Peute L; Jaspers M
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Jun; 114():66-75. PubMed ID: 29673606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Framework for Competencies for the Use of Mobile Technologies in Psychiatry and Medicine: Scoping Review.
Hilty D; Chan S; Torous J; Luo J; Boland R
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Feb; 8(2):e12229. PubMed ID: 32130153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: A case study.
Cho H; Yen PY; Dowding D; Merrill JA; Schnall R
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Oct; 86():79-89. PubMed ID: 30145317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. endoscope-i: an innovation in mobile endoscopic technology transforming the delivery of patient care in otolaryngology.
Mistry N; Coulson C; George A
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2017 Nov; 14(11):913-918. PubMed ID: 28972409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating mobile health (mHealth) technology.
Brown W; Yen PY; Rojas M; Schnall R
J Biomed Inform; 2013 Dec; 46(6):1080-7. PubMed ID: 23973872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Malay Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (M-MAUQ): Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study.
Mustafa N; Safii NS; Jaffar A; Sani NS; Mohamad MI; Abd Rahman AH; Mohd Sidik S
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Feb; 9(2):e24457. PubMed ID: 33538704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Operability, Usefulness, and Task-Technology Fit of an mHealth App for Delivering Primary Health Care Services by Community Health Workers in Underserved Areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan: Qualitative Study.
Zaidi S; Kazi AM; Riaz A; Ali A; Najmi R; Jabeen R; Khudadad U; Sayani S
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Sep; 22(9):e18414. PubMed ID: 32940612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Geospatial assistive technologies for wheelchair users: a scoping review of usability measures and criteria for mobile user interfaces and their potential applicability.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA; Routhier F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):119-131. PubMed ID: 30663444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing usability of eHealth technology: A comparison of usability benchmarking instruments.
Broekhuis M; van Velsen L; Hermens H
Int J Med Inform; 2019 Aug; 128():24-31. PubMed ID: 31160008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usability Evaluations of Mobile Mental Health Technologies: Systematic Review.
Inal Y; Wake JD; Guribye F; Nordgreen T
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jan; 22(1):e15337. PubMed ID: 31904579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of the FITT framework to understand patients' experiences using a real-time medication monitoring pill bottle linked to a mobile-based HIV self-management app: A qualitative study.
Cho H; Flynn G; Saylor M; Gradilla M; Schnall R
Int J Med Inform; 2019 Nov; 131():103949. PubMed ID: 31561192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of mobile health technologies in allergy care: An EAACI position paper.
Matricardi PM; Dramburg S; Alvarez-Perea A; Antolín-Amérigo D; Apfelbacher C; Atanaskovic-Markovic M; Berger U; Blaiss MS; Blank S; Boni E; Bonini M; Bousquet J; Brockow K; Buters J; Cardona V; Caubet JC; Cavkaytar Ö; Elliott T; Esteban-Gorgojo I; Fonseca JA; Gardner J; Gevaert P; Ghiordanescu I; Hellings P; Hoffmann-Sommergruber K; Fusun Kalpaklioglu A; Marmouz F; Meijide Calderón Á; Mösges R; Nakonechna A; Ollert M; Oteros J; Pajno G; Panaitescu C; Perez-Formigo D; Pfaar O; Pitsios C; Rudenko M; Ryan D; Sánchez-García S; Shih J; Tripodi S; Van der Poel LA; van Os-Medendorp H; Varricchi G; Wittmann J; Worm M; Agache I
Allergy; 2020 Feb; 75(2):259-272. PubMed ID: 31230373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Geospatial assistive technologies: potential usability criteria identified from manual wheelchair users.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Nov; 15(8):844-855. PubMed ID: 31226889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
