These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23228081)

  • 1. Standard setting of script concordance tests using an adapted Nedelsky approach.
    Linn AM; Tonkin A; Duggan P
    Med Teach; 2013 Apr; 35(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 23228081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two standard-setting approaches in high-stakes clinical performance assessment using generalizability theory.
    Richter Lagha RA; Boscardin CK; May W; Fung CC
    Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1077-82. PubMed ID: 22722349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Setting a standard on the pilot National Board Dental Examination.
    Kramer GA; DeMarais DR
    J Dent Educ; 1992 Oct; 56(10):684-8. PubMed ID: 1430520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A standard setting method with the best performing students as point of reference: practical and affordable.
    Cohen-Schotanus J; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 20163232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A plea for the proper use of criterion-referenced tests in medical assessment.
    Ricketts C
    Med Educ; 2009 Dec; 43(12):1141-6. PubMed ID: 19930504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishing passing standards for classroom achievement tests in medical education: a comparative study of four methods.
    Downing SM; Lieska NG; Raible MD
    Acad Med; 2003 Oct; 78(10 Suppl):S85-7. PubMed ID: 14557105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring gains in the clinical reasoning of medical students: longitudinal results from a school-wide script concordance test.
    Humbert AJ; Miech EJ
    Acad Med; 2014 Jul; 89(7):1046-50. PubMed ID: 24979174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Competence in the musculoskeletal system: assessing the progression of knowledge through an undergraduate medical course.
    Basu S; Roberts C; Newble DI; Snaith M
    Med Educ; 2004 Dec; 38(12):1253-60. PubMed ID: 15566536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A better norm-referenced grading using the standard deviation criterion.
    Chan WS
    Teach Learn Med; 2014; 26(4):364-5. PubMed ID: 25318031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of clinical reasoning: A Script Concordance test designed for pre-clinical medical students.
    Humbert AJ; Johnson MT; Miech E; Friedberg F; Grackin JA; Seidman PA
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 21609176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are script concordance tests suitable for the assessment of undergraduate students? A multicenter comparative study.
    Cohen Aubart F; Papo T; Hertig A; Renaud MC; Steichen O; Amoura Z; Braun M; Palombi O; Duguet A; Roux D
    Rev Med Interne; 2021 Apr; 42(4):243-250. PubMed ID: 33288231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standard setting for OSCEs: trial of borderline approach.
    Kilminster S; Roberts T
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 15316271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fine-tuning the standard setting of objective structured practical examinations in clinical anatomy.
    Dissabandara LO; Nawaratna S; Nirthanan S
    Anat Sci Educ; 2023; 16(3):486-496. PubMed ID: 36622721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in assessment and standard setting practices across UK undergraduate medicine and the need for a benchmark.
    MacDougall M
    Int J Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 6():125-35. PubMed ID: 26520472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modifying Hofstee standard setting for assessments that vary in difficulty, and to determine boundaries for different levels of achievement.
    Burr SA; Whittle J; Fairclough LC; Coombes L; Todd I
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jan; 16():34. PubMed ID: 26821741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standard setting for progress tests: combining external and internal standards.
    Ricketts C; Freeman AC; Coombes LR
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):589-93. PubMed ID: 19493184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Description and impact of using a standard-setting method for determining pass/fail scores in a surgery clerkship.
    Schindler N; Corcoran J; DaRosa D
    Am J Surg; 2007 Feb; 193(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 17236857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cohort study of examination performance of undergraduate medical students learning in community settings.
    Worley P; Esterman A; Prideaux D
    BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7433):207-9. PubMed ID: 14739189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approaches to learning and studying in medical students: validation of a revised inventory and its relation to student characteristics and performance.
    Mattick K; Dennis I; Bligh J
    Med Educ; 2004 May; 38(5):535-43. PubMed ID: 15107087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Team Objective Structured Bedside Assessment (TOSBA): a novel and feasible way of providing formative teaching and assessment.
    Miller SD; Butler MW; Meagher F; Costello RW; McElvaney NG
    Med Teach; 2007 Mar; 29(2-3):156-9. PubMed ID: 17701626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.