155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23228113)
1. Evaluation of the LithoGold LG-380 lithotripter: in vitro acoustic characterization and assessment of renal injury in the pig model.
Pishchalnikov YA; McAteer JA; Williams JC; Connors BA; Handa RK; Lingeman JE; Evan AP
J Endourol; 2013 May; 27(5):631-9. PubMed ID: 23228113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Independent assessment of a wide-focus, low-pressure electromagnetic lithotripter: absence of renal bioeffects in the pig.
Evan AP; McAteer JA; Connors BA; Pishchalnikov YA; Handa RK; Blomgren P; Willis LR; Williams JC; Lingeman JE; Gao S
BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):382-8. PubMed ID: 17922871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of shock wave lithotripsy injury in the pig using a narrow focal zone lithotriptor.
Connors BA; McAteer JA; Evan AP; Blomgren PM; Handa RK; Johnson CD; Gao S; Pishchalnikov YA; Lingeman JE
BJU Int; 2012 Nov; 110(9):1376-85. PubMed ID: 22519983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy.
Handa RK; McAteer JA; Connors BA; Liu Z; Lingeman JE; Evan AP
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E1041-7. PubMed ID: 22612388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-head lithotripsy in synchronous mode: acute effect on renal function and morphology in the pig.
Handa RK; McAteer JA; Willis LR; Pishchalnikov YA; Connors BA; Ying J; Lingeman JE; Evan AP
BJU Int; 2007 May; 99(5):1134-42. PubMed ID: 17309558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery.
Evan AP; McAteer JA; Connors BA; Blomgren PM; Lingeman JE
BJU Int; 2007 Sep; 100(3):624-7; discussion 627-8. PubMed ID: 17550415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using 300 Pretreatment Shock Waves in a Voltage Ramping Protocol Can Significantly Reduce Tissue Injury During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
Connors BA; Evan AP; Handa RK; Blomgren PM; Johnson CD; Liu Z; Lingeman JE
J Endourol; 2016 Sep; 30(9):1004-8. PubMed ID: 27307070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new electromagnetic shock-wave generator "SLX-F2" with user-selectable dual focus size: ex vivo evaluation of renal injury.
Leistner R; Wendt-Nordahl G; Grobholz R; Michel MS; Marlinghaus E; Köhrmann KU; Alken P; Häcker A
Urol Res; 2007 Aug; 35(4):165-71. PubMed ID: 17483935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping.
Connors BA; Evan AP; Blomgren PM; Handa RK; Willis LR; Gao S
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 18680494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance.
Li G; Williams JC; Pishchalnikov YA; Liu Z; McAteer JA
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E871-7. PubMed ID: 22938566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pretreatment with low-energy shock waves induces renal vasoconstriction during standard shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): a treatment protocol known to reduce SWL-induced renal injury.
Handa RK; Bailey MR; Paun M; Gao S; Connors BA; Willis LR; Evan AP
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1270-4. PubMed ID: 19154458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the body wall on lithotripter shock waves.
Li G; McAteer JA; Williams JC; Berwick ZC
J Endourol; 2014 Apr; 28(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 24308532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields.
Xing Y; Chen TT; Simmons WN; Sankin G; Cocks FH; Lipkin ME; Preminger GM; Zhong P
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):502-509. PubMed ID: 28340536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Renal Protection Phenomenon Observed in a Porcine Model After Electromagnetic Lithotripsy Using a Treatment Pause.
Connors BA; Gardner T; Liu Z; Lingeman JE; Williams JC
J Endourol; 2021 May; 35(5):682-686. PubMed ID: 33472540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Preliminary Report on Stone Breakage and Lesion Size Produced by a New Extracorporeal Electrohydraulic (Sparker Array) Discharge Device.
Connors BA; Schaefer RB; Gallagher JJ; Johnson CD; Li G; Handa RK; Evan AP
Urology; 2018 Jun; 116():213-217. PubMed ID: 29596866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.
Pishchalnikov YA; McAteer JA; Williams JC; Pishchalnikova IV; Vonderhaar RJ
J Endourol; 2006 Aug; 20(8):537-41. PubMed ID: 16903810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative measurements of acoustic emissions from cavitation at the surface of a stone in response to a lithotripter shock wave.
Chitnis PV; Cleveland RO
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):1929-32. PubMed ID: 16642802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shock wave lithotripsy of stones implanted in the proximal ureter of the pig.
Paterson RF; Kim SC; Kuo RL; Lingeman JE; Evan AP; Connors BA; Williams JC; McAteer JA
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1391-4. PubMed ID: 15758811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of a modified acoustic lens for electromagnetic shock wave lithotripters in a swine model.
Mancini JG; Neisius A; Smith N; Sankin G; Astroza GM; Lipkin ME; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Zhong P
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):1096-101. PubMed ID: 23485509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.
Qin J; Simmons WN; Sankin G; Zhong P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2635-45. PubMed ID: 20370044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
