These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23228251)
1. Pixel intensity and fractal dimension of periapical lesions visually indiscernible in radiographs. Soğur E; Baksı BG; Gröndahl HG; Sen BH J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 23228251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of image compression on diagnostic quality of digital images for detection of chemically-induced periapical lesions. Koenig L; Parks E; Analoui M; Eckert G Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 15140821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does a combination of two radiographs increase accuracy in detecting acid-induced periapical lesions and does it approach the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography scanning? Soğur E; Gröndahl HG; Baksı BG; Mert A J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 22244624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film. Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detectability of chemically induced periapical lesions by limited cone beam computed tomography, intra-oral digital and conventional film radiography. Sogur E; Baksi BG; Gröndahl HG; Lomcali G; Sen BH Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):458-64. PubMed ID: 19767516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image resolution and exposure time of digital radiographs affects fractal dimension of periapical bone. Baksi BG; Fidler A Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Oct; 16(5):1507-10. PubMed ID: 22124611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction. Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of dental radiographs. Yasar F; Akgünlü F Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Sep; 34(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 16120874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fractal analysis of periapical bone from lossy compressed radiographs: a comparison of two lossy compression methods. Baksi BG; Fidler A J Digit Imaging; 2011 Dec; 24(6):993-8. PubMed ID: 21465294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of virtual simulation platform for investigation of the radiographic features of periapical bone lesion. Gao Y; Haapasalo M; Shen Y; Wu H; Jiang H; Zhou X J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1404-9. PubMed ID: 20647106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pixel intensity and fractal analyses: detecting osteoporosis in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women by using digital panoramic images. Tosoni GM; Lurie AG; Cowan AE; Burleson JA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 16876068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of technical factors on the fractal dimension in different dental radiographic images. Amuk M; Saribal GS; Ersu N; Yilmaz S Eur Oral Res; 2023 May; 57(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 37525855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of phosphor plate-based radiographic image specifications on fractal analysis of alveolar bone. Oliveira-Santos N; Michels M; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Oct; 128(4):418-423. PubMed ID: 31324583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of lossy compression on diagnostic accuracy of radiographs for periapical lesions. Eraso FE; Analoui M; Watson AB; Rebeschini R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):621-5. PubMed ID: 12075215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems. Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Paganini GA; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11210259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital image analysis of cadaver mandibular trabecular bone patterns. Shrout MK; Jett S; Mailhot JM; Potter BJ; Borke JL; Hildebolt CF J Periodontol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1342-7. PubMed ID: 14584868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using direct digital imaging. Meier AW; Brown CE; Miles DA; Analoui M J Endod; 1996 Oct; 22(10):516-20. PubMed ID: 9198437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in the fractal dimension, feret diameter, and lacunarity of mandibular alveolar bone during initial healing of dental implants. Önem E; Baksı BG; Sogur E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1009-13. PubMed ID: 23057012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of histogram equalization and contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization effect on image quality and fractal dimensions of digital periapical radiographs. Mehdizadeh M; Tavakoli Tafti K; Soltani P Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):418-424. PubMed ID: 36076131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws. Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 17048029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]