BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23228385)

  • 1. Online reviews of 500 urologists.
    Ellimoottil C; Hart A; Greco K; Quek ML; Farooq A
    J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2269-73. PubMed ID: 23228385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [German language physician rating sites].
    Strech D; Reimann S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):e61-7. PubMed ID: 22189671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Online reviews of orthopedic surgeons: an emerging trend.
    Frost C; Mesfin A
    Orthopedics; 2015 Apr; 38(4):e257-62. PubMed ID: 25901617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online Ratings of Urologists: Comprehensive Analysis.
    Pike CW; Zillioux J; Rapp D
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e12436. PubMed ID: 31267982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physician rating websites: do radiologists have an online presence?
    Gilbert K; Hawkins CM; Hughes DR; Patel K; Gogia N; Sekhar A; Duszak R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Aug; 12(8):867-71. PubMed ID: 26250980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study.
    Yan Q; Jensen KJ; Thomas R; Field AR; Jiang Z; Goei C; Davies MG
    JMIR Cardio; 2021 Feb; 5(1):e22975. PubMed ID: 33625359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
    Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient assessments and online ratings of quality care: a "wake-up call" for providers.
    Merrell JG; Levy BH; Johnson DA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Nov; 108(11):1676-85. PubMed ID: 24192941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of Social Media Presence with Online Physician Ratings and Surgical Volume Among California Urologists: Observational Study.
    Houman J; Weinberger J; Caron A; Hannemann A; Zaliznyak M; Patel D; Moradzadeh A; Daskivich TJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Aug; 21(8):e10195. PubMed ID: 31411141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
    Kadry B; Chu LF; Kadry B; Gammas D; Macario A
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e95. PubMed ID: 22088924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding Your Online Ratings: A Methodological Analysis Using Urogynecologists in the United States.
    Huber SA; Priestley J; Kasabwala K; Gadidov B; Culligan P
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 30807427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Reimann S
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e299. PubMed ID: 28842391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?
    Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Barker GP; Rush AJ; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 30497169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parental awareness and use of online physician rating sites.
    Hanauer DA; Zheng K; Singer DC; Gebremariam A; Davis MM
    Pediatrics; 2014 Oct; 134(4):e966-75. PubMed ID: 25246629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
    Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting of Patient Experience Data on Health Systems' Websites and Commercial Physician-Rating Websites: Mixed-Methods Analysis.
    Lagu T; Norton CM; Russo LM; Priya A; Goff SL; Lindenauer PK
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e12007. PubMed ID: 30916654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.