445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23228498)
1. Three-dimensional fit of lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro.
Schaefer O; Kuepper H; Sigusch BW; Thompson GA; Hefti AF; Guentsch A
J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 23228498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility.
Schaefer O; Watts DC; Sigusch BW; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
Dent Mater; 2012 Mar; 28(3):320-6. PubMed ID: 22265824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study.
Schaefer O; Kuepper H; Thompson GA; Cachovan G; Hefti AF; Guentsch A
Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):851-8. PubMed ID: 23743092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system.
Souza RO; Özcan M; Pavanelli CA; Buso L; Lombardo GH; Michida SM; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA
J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb; 21(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 22050205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling.
Syrek A; Reich G; Ranftl D; Klein C; Cerny B; Brodesser J
J Dent; 2010 Jul; 38(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 20381576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fit Accuracy of Pressed and Milled Lithium Disilicate Inlays Fabricated From Conventional Impressions or a Laboratory-Based Digital Workflow.
Homsy F; Bottin M; Özcan M; Majzoub Z
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb; 27(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 30779496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
