These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23228592)

  • 1. Biometric measurements in highly myopic eyes.
    Shen P; Zheng Y; Ding X; Liu B; Congdon N; Morgan I; He M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 23228592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Li J; Chen H; Savini G; Lu W; Yu X; Bao F; Wang Q; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26948780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer.
    Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer.
    Huang J; Savini G; Wu F; Yu X; Yang J; Yu A; Yu Y; Wang Q
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2233-41. PubMed ID: 26703300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparability of anterior chamber depth measurements with partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry in pseudophakic eyes.
    Luft N; Hirnschall N; Farrokhi S; Findl O
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1678-84. PubMed ID: 26432125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer.
    Rohrer K; Frueh BE; Wälti R; Clemetson IA; Tappeiner C; Goldblum D
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2087-92. PubMed ID: 19744720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients.
    Goebels S; Pattmöller M; Eppig T; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements by 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography, partial coherence interferometry biometry, Scheimpflug rotating camera imaging, and ultrasound biomicroscopy.
    Nakakura S; Mori E; Nagatomi N; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 38(7):1207-13. PubMed ID: 22613688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer: repeatability and agreement.
    Chen W; McAlinden C; Pesudovs K; Wang Q; Lu F; Feng Y; Chen J; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1626-32. PubMed ID: 22763002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 20362858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biometry with a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer: Repeatability and agreement with an optical low-coherence reflectometry device.
    Kurian M; Negalur N; Das S; Puttaiah NK; Haria D; J TS; Thakkar MM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Apr; 42(4):577-81. PubMed ID: 27113881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster.
    Huang J; Savini G; Li J; Lu W; Wu F; Wang J; Li Y; Feng Y; Wang Q
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 98(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 24795336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry.
    Jasvinder S; Khang TF; Sarinder KK; Loo VP; Subrayan V
    Eye (Lond); 2011 Jun; 25(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 21394115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparision of two new optical biometry devices with an ultrasonic immersion biometer].
    Chiseliţă D; Cantemir A; Gălăţanu C; Irod A
    Oftalmologia; 2011; 55(4):104-10. PubMed ID: 22642145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients.
    Montés-Micó R; Carones F; Buttacchio A; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 27(9):665-71. PubMed ID: 21323302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.
    Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer.
    Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparision of Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Versus Ultrasonic Biometry in High Hypermetropia.
    Aydin R; Karaman Erdur S; Serefoglu Cabuk K; Karahan E; Kaynak S
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44 Suppl 1():S115-S117. PubMed ID: 27898517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.