These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2323076)

  • 1. Electrical stimulation of the round window: a selection procedure for single-channel cochlear implantation.
    Gray RF; Baguley DM
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1990 Feb; 15(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 2323076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Use of intraoperative round window electrocochleography for assessment of cochlear implantation safety].
    Wang L; Cao K; Wang Z
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 20(18):822-4. PubMed ID: 17144488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Round window versus promontory stimulation: assessment for cochlear implant candidacy.
    Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Nov; 100(11):889-92. PubMed ID: 1746821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of the promontory stimulation test for the preoperative evaluation of cochlear implants: a comparison with the round window stimulation test.
    Ito J; Tsuji J; Sakakihara J
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1994; 21(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 7980189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory brainstem potentials in man evoked by electrical stimulation of the round window.
    Chouard CH; Meyer B; Donadieu F
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(3-4):287-93. PubMed ID: 443011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Chorimac-12. A multichannel cochlear implant for total deafness. Description and clinical results.
    Chouard CH; Fugain C; Meyer B; Chabolle F
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1985; 39(4):735-48. PubMed ID: 3841455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Test of electrical stimulation of the round window. Diagnostic and prognostic value of the rehabilitation of total deafness by cochlear implant].
    Chouard CH; Koca E; Meyer B; Jacquier I
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 7825941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of round window electrophysiological techniques in the selection of children for cochlear implants.
    Gibson W; Sanli H
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():148-51. PubMed ID: 11892131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
    Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of a Cochlear Implant Electrode Array on the Middle Ear Transfer Function.
    Pazen D; Anagiotos A; Nünning M; Gostian AO; Ortmann M; Beutner D
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e241-e255. PubMed ID: 28207578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative electrical stimulation for cochlear implant selection. The use of ear canal electrodes versus transtympanic electrodes.
    Spies TH; Snik AF; Mens LH; van den Broek P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 Sep; 113(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 8266782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrocochleography in profoundly deaf children: comparison of promontory and round window techniques.
    Aso S; Gibson WP
    Am J Otol; 1994 May; 15(3):376-9. PubMed ID: 8579143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results and perspectives with extracochlear round window electrodes.
    Dillier N; Spillmann T
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():221-9. PubMed ID: 6596846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Round window electrocochleography and speech perception outcomes in adult cochlear implant subjects: comparison with audiometric and biographical information.
    McClellan JH; Formeister EJ; Merwin WH; Dillon MT; Calloway N; Iseli C; Buchman CA; Fitzpatrick DC; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Oct; 35(9):e245-52. PubMed ID: 25118584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling the effect of round window stiffness on residual hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Elliott SJ; Ni G; Verschuur CA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():155-167. PubMed ID: 27586580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response Changes During Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Using Extracochlear Electrocochleography.
    Giardina CK; Khan TE; Pulver SH; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Brown KD; Pillsbury HC; Fitzpatrick DC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1146-1156. PubMed ID: 29554036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized testing of signal-encoding strategies with round-window implants.
    Dillier N; Spillmann T; Güntensperger J
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():360-9. PubMed ID: 6575658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Impedance changes in cochlear implant users].
    Zadrozniak M; Szymański M; Siwiec H; Broda T
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 21916223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of the round window electrical stimulation in 460 cases of total deafness.
    Meyer B; Drira M; Gegu D; Chouard CH
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():168-76. PubMed ID: 6596841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.