123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23230974)
41. The Impact of Acquisition Dose on Quantitative Breast Density Estimation with Digital Mammography: Results from ACRIN PA 4006.
Chen L; Ray S; Keller BM; Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Conant EF; Kontos D
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):693-700. PubMed ID: 27002418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.
Carney PA; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K; Rosenberg R; Rutter CM; Geller BM; Abraham LA; Taplin SH; Dignan M; Cutter G; Ballard-Barbash R
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Feb; 138(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12558355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The effect of hormone replacement therapy on the sensitivity of screening mammograms.
Litherland JC; Stallard S; Hole D; Cordiner C
Clin Radiol; 1999 May; 54(5):285-8. PubMed ID: 10362232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The impact of bariatric surgery on qualitative and quantitative breast density.
Hassinger TE; Mehaffey JH; Knisely AT; Contrella BN; Brenin DR; Schroen AT; Schirmer BD; Hallowell PT; Harvey JA; Showalter SL
Breast J; 2019 Nov; 25(6):1198-1205. PubMed ID: 31310402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Pectoral muscle attenuation as a marker for breast cancer risk in full-field digital mammography.
Cheddad A; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Jun; 24(6):985-91. PubMed ID: 25870223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Likelihood of additional work-up among women undergoing routine screening mammography: the impact of age, breast density, and hormone therapy use.
Carney PA; Kasales CJ; Tosteson AN; Weiss JE; Goodrich ME; Poplack SP; Wells WS; Titus-Ernstoff L
Prev Med; 2004 Jul; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15207985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Positive predictive values by mammographic density and screening mode in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Moshina N; Ursin G; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Hofvind S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):248-254. PubMed ID: 26724673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammography.
Molloi S; Ducote JL; Ding H; Feig SA
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081917. PubMed ID: 25086548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. An automated approach for estimation of breast density.
Heine JJ; Carston MJ; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Wu FF; Pankratz VS; Sellers TA; Vachon CM
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Nov; 17(11):3090-7. PubMed ID: 18990749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Mammographic density estimation with automated volumetric breast density measurement.
Ko SY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 24843235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Mammographic density changes in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: is effect of hormone replacement therapy predictable?
Sterns EE; Zee B
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2000 Jan; 59(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 10817347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated Measures.
Conant EF; Keller BM; Pantalone L; Gastounioti A; McDonald ES; Kontos D
Radiology; 2017 Jun; 283(3):673-680. PubMed ID: 28121523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Case-control study of increased mammographic breast density response to hormone replacement therapy.
Vachon CM; Sellers TA; Vierkant RA; Wu FF; Brandt KR
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Nov; 11(11):1382-8. PubMed ID: 12433715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Mammographic texture resemblance generalizes as an independent risk factor for breast cancer.
Nielsen M; Vachon CM; Scott CG; Chernoff K; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M; Karsdal MA
Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Apr; 16(2):R37. PubMed ID: 24713478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Association between computed tissue density asymmetry in bilateral mammograms and near-term breast cancer risk.
Zheng B; Tan M; Ramalingam P; Gur D
Breast J; 2014; 20(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 24673749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Quantitative analysis for breast density estimation in low dose chest CT scans.
Moon WK; Lo CM; Goo JM; Bae MS; Chang JM; Huang CS; Chen JH; Ivanova V; Chang RF
J Med Syst; 2014 Mar; 38(3):21. PubMed ID: 24643751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Short-term (1-2 mo) hormone therapy cessation before mammography.
Reed SD; Buist DS; Anderson ML; Bowles EJ; Fitzgibbons D; Seger D; Newton KM
Menopause; 2009; 16(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 19455069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
