353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23231128)
1. Signal-to-noise ratio adaptive post-filtering method for intelligibility enhancement of telephone speech.
Jokinen E; Yrttiaho S; Pulakka H; Vainio M; Alku P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3990-4001. PubMed ID: 23231128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
Chen F; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conversational quality evaluation of artificial bandwidth extension of telephone speech.
Pulakka H; Laaksonen L; Yrttiaho S; Myllylä V; Alku P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):848-61. PubMed ID: 22894208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A beamformer post-filter for cochlear implant noise reduction.
Hersbach AA; Grayden DB; Fallon JB; McDermott HJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2412-20. PubMed ID: 23556606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intelligibility and listener preference of telephone speech in the presence of babble noise.
Hall JL; Flanagan JL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):280-5. PubMed ID: 20058974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intelligibility of time-compressed speech: the effect of uniform versus non-uniform time-compression algorithms.
Schlueter A; Lemke U; Kollmeier B; Holube I
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1541-55. PubMed ID: 24606289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility.
Arweiler I; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
Roman N; Woodruff J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extension and evaluation of a near-end listening enhancement algorithm for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rennies J; Drefs J; Hülsmeier D; Schepker H; Doclo S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2526. PubMed ID: 28464693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
Stilp CE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
Rao MD; Letowski T
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
Roman N; Woodruff J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
