These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23231268)

  • 1. Point/counterpoint: physicists who are responsible for high-tech radiotherapy procedures should have to be specially credentialed.
    Kavanagh BD; Ibbott GS; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7181-4. PubMed ID: 23231268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supervision requirements for qualified medical physicists.
    Hevezi JM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Sep; 5(9):1010-1. PubMed ID: 18755443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Credentialing: the role of the American Board of Medical Physics.
    Sternick E
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Sep; 11(9):55-7. PubMed ID: 10121767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implications of licensure of medical physicists. A study in risk management and quality improvement. Part 1.
    Mills M
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Feb; 13(2):45-6, 50-1. PubMed ID: 10132932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Point/Counterpoint. Medical physicists should be allowed by states to image and treat, just like radiologic technologists.
    Gossman MS; Burgess LA; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20175459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical physicist.
    Clin Privil White Pap; 2004 Mar; (196):1-12. PubMed ID: 15002435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conjoint Statement of the SNM, ACNM, and ABNM on credentialing and delineation of privileges for therapeutic procedures using radiopharmaceuticals.
    Delbeke D; Graham M; Royal H; Segall G; Shulkin BL; Ziessman HA; ; ;
    J Nucl Med; 2011 Feb; 52(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 21270458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Point/Counterpoint. The proposed MOC requirements for physicists are reasonable.
    Thomas SR; Garrett JA; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2319-22. PubMed ID: 16898432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introduction of Medical Physics Leadership Academy (MPLA) case studies.
    Gronberg M; Wang D;
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):287. PubMed ID: 33739586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Point/counterpoint. The shortage of radiation oncology physicists is addressable through remote treatment planning combined with periodic visits by consultant physicists.
    Zellmer D; Klein E; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1167-9. PubMed ID: 18491507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Point/counterpoint. Bright young physicists should be advised to avoid careers in radiation therapy.
    Schulz RJ; Podgorsak MB; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2845-7. PubMed ID: 19673183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Point/counterpoint. Medical physics graduate programs should adjust enrollment to achieve equilibrium between graduates and residents.
    Bayouth JE; Burmeister JW; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):ii-iv. PubMed ID: 21928615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Point/Counterpoint. Authorization to practice as a medical physicist is sometimes better achieved by registration rather than licensure.
    Pfeiffer DE; Masten JP; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):3915-7. PubMed ID: 20879553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Point/Counterpoint: the 2014 initiative is not only unnecessary but it constitutes a threat to the future of medical physics.
    Fullerton GD; Vanek KN; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5267-70. PubMed ID: 21992343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Point/Counterpoint. Peer reviews of medical physics practices often yield little information because the AAPM has not been proactive in developing appropriate peer-review guidelines.
    Gossman M; Halvorsen P; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3701-4. PubMed ID: 17985614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Point/counterpoint. Radiotherapy physicists have become glorified technicians rather than clinical scientists.
    Amols HI; Van den Heuvel F; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1379-81. PubMed ID: 20443458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Point/counterpoint. The physics components of the ACR MRI Accreditation Program are overly tedious and beyond what is needed to ensure good patient care.
    Sobol WT; NessAiver MS; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3419-21. PubMed ID: 18777900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Point/Counterpoint. The most suitable person to establish quality assurance guidelines for the generation and use of noncommercial clinical software is a medical physicist.
    Kelly D; Wassyng A; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):090601. PubMed ID: 25186373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A report from the AAPM Subcommittee on Guidelines for Competency Evaluation for Clinical Medical Physicists in Radiation Oncology.
    Pavord DC; Birnbaum S; Bocuzzi D; deBoer S; Freedman DJ; Schell M; Sutlief S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):3-14. PubMed ID: 27455473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Demographic characteristics of physicists who evaluate mammographic units.
    Rothenberg LN; Deye JA; High MD; Jessop NW; Sternick ES
    Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):373-7. PubMed ID: 7824712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.