BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23231281)

  • 1. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population.
    Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; O'Connell AM
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28. PubMed ID: 23231281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography.
    Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; O'Connell AM; Conover DL
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):7921-36. PubMed ID: 24165162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A minimum spanning forest based classification method for dedicated breast CT images.
    Pike R; Sechopoulos I; Fei B
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6190-202. PubMed ID: 26520712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technical note: Skin thickness measurements using high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT.
    Shi L; Vedantham S; Karellas A; O'Connell AM
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031913. PubMed ID: 23464328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated detection of mass lesions in dedicated breast CT: a preliminary study.
    Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Boone JM; Lindfors KK; Yang K
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):866-73. PubMed ID: 22320796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
    Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.
    Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of slice thickness on detectability in breast CT using a prewhitened matched filter and simulated mass lesions.
    Packard NJ; Abbey CK; Yang K; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1818-30. PubMed ID: 22482604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
    O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.
    Gong X; Vedula AA; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2183-95. PubMed ID: 15248571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation doses in volume-of-interest breast computed tomography--A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Yi Y; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):3063-75. PubMed ID: 26127058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. TU-E-217BCD-05: Dedicated Breast CT: Skin Thickness Measurements in a Diagnostic Population.
    Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; O'Connell A
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part24):3914-3915. PubMed ID: 28518695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast CT: Reproducibility of Volumetric Glandular Fraction with Advanced Image Reconstruction Methods.
    Vedantham S; Tseng HW; Fu Z; Chow HS
    Tomography; 2023 Nov; 9(6):2039-2051. PubMed ID: 37987346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
    Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An unsupervised automatic segmentation algorithm for breast tissue classification of dedicated breast computed tomography images.
    Caballo M; Boone JM; Mann R; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2542-2559. PubMed ID: 29676025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging.
    Glick SJ; Thacker S; Gong X; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 17278485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.