279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23231301)
21. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Teuwen J; Vreemann S; Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Gubern-Merida A; Sechopoulos I
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29254355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Non-Isocentric Geometry for Next-Generation Tomosynthesis With Super-Resolution.
Acciavatti RJ; Choi CJ; Vent TL; Barufaldi B; Cohen EA; Wileyto EP; Maidment ADA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2024 Jan; 43(1):377-391. PubMed ID: 37603482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21776781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of super-resolution and image acquisition on the detection of calcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Barufaldi B; Acciavatti RJ; Conant EF; Maidment ADA
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):193-203. PubMed ID: 37572187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images.
Vecchio S; Albanese A; Vignoli P; Taibi A
Eur Radiol; 2011 Jun; 21(6):1207-13. PubMed ID: 21193910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Artifact reduction methods for truncated projections in iterative breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 19478639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Digital tomosynthesis: technique.
Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 24792651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Case for Wide-Angle Breast Tomosynthesis.
Samei E; Thompson J; Richard S; Bowsher J
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):860-9. PubMed ID: 25920335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. GPU acceleration of a model-based iterative method for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Cavicchioli R; Hu JC; Loli Piccolomini E; Morotti E; Zanni L
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):43. PubMed ID: 31913333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Simulation of 3D objects into breast tomosynthesis images.
Shaheen E; Zanca F; Sisini F; Zhang G; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):108-12. PubMed ID: 20207750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional cascaded system analysis of a 50 µm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Vassiljev N; Konstantinidis AC; Speller RD; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1994-2017. PubMed ID: 28072394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Classification of clusters of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Ho CP; Tromans C; Schnabel JA; Brady M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3166-9. PubMed ID: 21096808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of averaging adjacent planes for artifact reduction in matrix inversion tomosynthesis.
Godfrey DJ; McAdams HP; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021907. PubMed ID: 23387755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system.
Zhou J; Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):1098-109. PubMed ID: 17441255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
