These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23231370)

  • 1. Influence of scan mode (180°/360°) of the cone beam computed tomography for preoperative dental implant measurements.
    Neves FS; Vasconcelos TV; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e155-8. PubMed ID: 23231370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes.
    Torres MG; Campos PS; Segundo NP; Navarro M; Crusoé-Rebello I
    Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 22382754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertical bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography images using different software packages.
    Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Moraes LA; Freitas DQ
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the milliamperage settings on cone beam computed tomography imaging for implant planning.
    Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Queiroz de Freitas D; Campos PS; Watanabe PC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1364-8. PubMed ID: 25265127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
    Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomical landmarks of mandibular interforaminal region related to dental implant placement with 3D CBCT: comparison between edentulous and dental mandibles.
    Sener E; Onem E; Akar GC; Govsa F; Ozer MA; Pinar Y; Mert A; Baksi Sen BG
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):615-623. PubMed ID: 29124343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam computerized tomography-aided surgical guidance system for dental implant placement: an ex vivo study.
    Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Özen T
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Dec; 38(6):706-12. PubMed ID: 21767205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.
    de Souza LA; Souza Picorelli Assis NM; Ribeiro RA; Pires Carvalho AC; Devito KL
    Ann Anat; 2016 May; 205():53-9. PubMed ID: 26851559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of CBCT imaging when placing dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible: a before-after study.
    Shelley AM; Ferrero A; Brunton P; Goodwin M; Horner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140316. PubMed ID: 25472617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Eren H; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130176. PubMed ID: 23956236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of implant placement in healed mandibular molar sites: A retrospective cone beam computed tomography study.
    He J; Liu Y; Lin Z; Li Y; Li C; Zhou L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):904.e1-904.e10. PubMed ID: 38472073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Kurt Bayrakdar S; Orhan K; Bayrakdar IS; Bilgir E; Ezhov M; Gusarev M; Shumilov E
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):86. PubMed ID: 34011314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. To Assess and Evaluate the Variation of Mandibular Anatomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Before Planning an Implant Surgery: A Population-based Retrospective Study.
    Kapoor V; Kumar N; Dahiya K; Sikka R; Sirana P; Singh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1381-1385. PubMed ID: 30602645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of the genial spinal canal in atrophic mandibles with a CBCT: a cadaver study.
    Birkenfeld F; Becker M; Sasse M; Gassling V; Lucius R; Wiltfang J; Kern M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(3):20140290. PubMed ID: 25411711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Head Orientation in Linear Measurement for Implant Planning in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A; Tabari S; Yarmohammadi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jul; 16(7):542-6. PubMed ID: 26329408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrospective analysis of bar-retained dentures with cantilever extension: marginal bone level changes around dental implants over time.
    Semper W; Heberer S; Nelson K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 20369100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Implant-Induced Artifacts on Interpreting Adjacent Bone Structures on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Sheridan RA; Chiang YC; Decker AM; Sutthiboonyapan P; Chan HL; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 29095787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The extremely resorbed mandible, 10-year results of a randomized controlled trial on 3 treatment strategies.
    Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Visser A; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):926-32. PubMed ID: 23638947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.