These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23231370)

  • 21. In vitro comparison of the effect of different slice thicknesses on the accuracy of linear measurements on cone beam computed tomography images in implant sites.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 25569395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital implant impressions by cone-beam computerized tomography: a pilot study.
    Corominas-Delgado C; Espona J; Lorente-Gascón M; Real-Voltas F; Roig M; Costa-Palau S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1407-1413. PubMed ID: 26715129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The extremely resorbed mandible: a comparative prospective study of 2-year results with 3 treatment strategies.
    Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 15346755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of maxillomandibular positioning in cone beam computed tomography for implant planning.
    Visconti MA; Verner FS; Assis NM; Devito KL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 42(7):880-6. PubMed ID: 23566433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery.
    Kühl S; Zürcher S; Mahid T; Müller-Gerbl M; Filippi A; Cattin P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 22551385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Imaging of dental implants in severely resorbed maxillae using detailed narrow-beam radiography. A methodological study.
    Svenson B; Palmqvist S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 9446975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of bone width lateral to the mandibular canal as an alternative approach for implant installation.
    Daróz SR; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Vidigal GM
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23303270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
    Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
    J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability of circumferential bone level assessment around single implants in healed ridges and extraction sockets using cone beam CT.
    Raes F; Renckens L; Aps J; Cosyn J; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):661-72. PubMed ID: 22008055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of a Novel Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanner for Bone Density Examinations in Preoperative 3D Reconstructions and Correlation with Primary Implant Stability.
    Sennerby L; Andersson P; Pagliani L; Giani C; Moretti G; Molinari M; Motroni A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):844-53. PubMed ID: 24373386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
    Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro.
    Sur J; Seki K; Koizumi H; Nakajima K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):e29-33. PubMed ID: 20598589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vertical distraction of the severely resorbed edentulous mandible: an assessment of treatment outcome.
    Raghoebar GM; Stellingsma K; Meijer HJ; Vissink A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 18548927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of Lingual Concavities in Submandibular Fossa Region in Patients requiring Dental Implants-A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Rajput BS; Merita S; Parihar AS; Vyas T; Kaur P; Chansoria S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1329-1333. PubMed ID: 30602636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Subjective image quality assessment of cross sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement.
    Shelley AM; Brunton P; Horner K
    J Dent; 2011 Nov; 39(11):764-70. PubMed ID: 21875641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Marginal bone loss adjacent to conventional and immediate loaded two implants supporting a ball-retained mandibular overdenture: a 3-year randomized clinical trial.
    Elsyad MA; Al-Mahdy YF; Fouad MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 21504479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.